[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.226.208.185. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 336
Citations 0
Correction
January 2019

Error in Byline

JAMA Surg. 2019;154(1):96. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5449

In the Original Investigation titled “Effect of Cricoid Pressure Compared With a Sham Procedure in the Rapid Sequence Induction of Anesthesia: The IRIS Randomized Clinical Trial,”1 that was published online October 17, 2018, there was an error in the byline. In addition to the byline authors, the byline should read “for the IRIS Investigators Group.” The IRIS Investigators who were originally listed in the Additional Contributions section are now listed in the Group Information section. This article was corrected online.

References
1.
Birenbaum  A, Hajage  D, Roche  S,  et al; for the IRIS Investigators Group.  Effect of cricoid pressure compared with a sham procedure in the rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: the IRIS randomized clinical trial [published online October 17, 2018].  JAMA Surg. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3577Google Scholar
×