Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Pirruccio K, Yoon YM, Ahn J. Fractures in Elderly Americans Associated With Walking Leashed Dogs. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(5):458–459. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0061
Dog walking is often suggested as an effective modality for improving physical health in elderly Americans.1 Nonetheless, injury risks associated with dog walking remain obscure. Considering that older patients are more vulnerable to fractures owing to falls or axial muscle compression forces inherent to walking motions, a risk-benefit analysis with respect to dog walking as an exercise alternative is essential to minimizing injury risk.2 This study represents a comprehensive, up-to-date investigation into fracture risk in older adults who use leashes when walking dogs.
A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was performed using the publicly available deidentified National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database of the US Consumer Product Safety Commission, which records product- or activity-related injuries in patients presenting to approximately 100 US hospital emergency departments stratified by size and location. This nationally representative, statistically validated probability sample can be used to derive reliable weighted national estimates and sampling errors for queried injuries.3 Data were acquired from a deidentified, publicly available database. According to the University of Pennsylvania IRB Standard Operating Procedures, institutional review board approval is waived in cases where data are redacted and openly publicly available.
Create a personal account or sign in to: