Association of Preoperative Patient Frailty and Operative Stress With Postoperative Mortality | Geriatrics | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.239.150.57. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Makary  MA, Segev  DL, Pronovost  PJ,  et al.  Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients.  J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(6):901-908. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.028PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Robinson  TN, Wu  DS, Pointer  L, Dunn  CL, Cleveland  JC  Jr, Moss  M.  Simple frailty score predicts postoperative complications across surgical specialties.  Am J Surg. 2013;206(4):544-550. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.03.012PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Lin  HS, Watts  JN, Peel  NM, Hubbard  RE.  Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review.  BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1):157. doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0329-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Robinson  TN, Wallace  JI, Wu  DS,  et al.  Accumulated frailty characteristics predict postoperative discharge institutionalization in the geriatric patient.  J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(1):37-42. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.056PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Kim  SW, Han  HS, Jung  HW,  et al.  Multidimensional frailty score for the prediction of postoperative mortality risk.  JAMA Surg. 2014;149(7):633-640. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.241PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
McIsaac  DI, Bryson  GL, van Walraven  C.  Association of frailty and 1-year postoperative mortality following major elective noncardiac surgery: a population-based cohort study.  JAMA Surg. 2016;151(6):538-545. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5085PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
McIsaac  DI, Taljaard  M, Bryson  GL,  et al.  Frailty as a predictor of death or new disability after surgery: a prospective cohort study  [published ahead of print July 24, 2018].  Ann Surg. 2018. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002967PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Shah  R, Attwood  K, Arya  S,  et al.  Association of frailty with failure to rescue after low-risk and high-risk inpatient surgery.  JAMA Surg. 2018;153(5):e180214. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0214PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Joseph  B, Phelan  H, Hassan  A,  et al.  The impact of frailty on failure-to-rescue in geriatric trauma patients: a prospective study.  J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(6):1150-1155. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001250PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Arya  S, Kim  SI, Duwayri  Y,  et al.  Frailty increases the risk of 30-day mortality, morbidity, and failure to rescue after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair independent of age and comorbidities.  J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(2):324-331. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.115PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Saxton  A, Velanovich  V.  Preoperative frailty and quality of life as predictors of postoperative complications.  Ann Surg. 2011;253(6):1223-1229. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318214bce7PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Augustin  T, Burstein  MD, Schneider  EB,  et al.  Frailty predicts risk of life-threatening complications and mortality after pancreatic resections.  Surgery. 2016;160(4):987-996. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2016.07.010PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Farhat  JS, Velanovich  V, Falvo  AJ,  et al.  Are the frail destined to fail? frailty index as predictor of surgical morbidity and mortality in the elderly.  J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1526-1530. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182542fabPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Suskind  AM, Walter  LC, Jin  C,  et al.  Impact of frailty on complications in patients undergoing common urological procedures: a study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database.  BJU Int. 2016;117(5):836-842. doi:10.1111/bju.13399PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Adams  P, Ghanem  T, Stachler  R, Hall  F, Velanovich  V, Rubinfeld  I.  Frailty as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in inpatient head and neck surgery.  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(8):783-789. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3969PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
George  EM, Burke  WM, Hou  JY,  et al.  Measurement and validation of frailty as a predictor of outcomes in women undergoing major gynaecological surgery.  BJOG. 2016;123(3):455-461. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13598PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Seib  CD, Rochefort  H, Chomsky-Higgins  K,  et al.  Association of patient frailty with increased morbidity after common ambulatory general surgery operations.  JAMA Surg. 2018;153(2):160-168. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4007PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Rumer  KK, Saraswathula  A, Melcher  ML.  Prehabilitation in our most frail surgical patients: are wearable fitness devices the next frontier?  Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2016;21(2):188-193. doi:10.1097/MOT.0000000000000295PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Halloway  S, Buchholz  SW, Wilbur  J, Schoeny  ME.  Prehabilitation interventions for older adults: an integrative review.  West J Nurs Res. 2015;37(1):103-123. doi:10.1177/0193945914551006PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Gillis  C, Li  C, Lee  L,  et al.  Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer.  Anesthesiology. 2014;121(5):937-947. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000393PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Carli  F, Awasthi  R, Gillis  C, Kassouf  W.  Optimizing a frail elderly patient for radical cystectomy with a prehabilitation program.  Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8(11-12):E884-E887. doi:10.5489/cuaj.2025PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Hall  DE, Arya  S, Schmid  KK,  et al.  Development and initial validation of the Risk Analysis Index for measuring frailty in surgical populations.  JAMA Surg. 2017;152(2):175-182. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4202PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Arya  S, Varley  P, Youk  A,  et al.  Recalibration and external validation of the Risk Analysis Index: a surgical frailty assessment tool  [published online March 19, 2019].  Ann Surg. 2019. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003276PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Schwarze  ML, Barnato  AE, Rathouz  PJ,  et al.  Development of a list of high-risk operations for patients 65 years and older.  JAMA Surg. 2015;150(4):325-331. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1819PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Massarweh  NN, Kaji  AH, Itani  KMF.  Practical guide to surgical data sets: Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP).  JAMA Surg. 2018;153(8):768-769. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0504PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Powell  C.  The Delphi technique: myths and realities.  J Adv Nurs. 2003;41(4):376-382. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Jones  J, Hunter  D.  Consensus methods for medical and health services research.  BMJ. 1995;311(7001):376-380. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Harris  PA, Taylor  R, Thielke  R, Payne  J, Gonzalez  N, Conde  JG.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.  J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Copeland  GP, Jones  D, Walters  M.  POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit.  Br J Surg. 1991;78(3):355-360. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800780327PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Scott  S, Lund  JN, Gold  S,  et al.  An evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring in predicting post-operative mortality in a level 1 critical care setting.  BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:104. doi:10.1186/1471-2253-14-104PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Haga  Y, Ikei  S, Ogawa  M.  Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery.  Surg Today. 1999;29(3):219-225. doi:10.1007/BF02483010PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Haga  Y, Ikejiri  K, Wada  Y,  et al.  A multicenter prospective study of surgical audit systems.  Ann Surg. 2011;253(1):194-201. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f66199PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
McIsaac  DI, Moloo  H, Bryson  GL, van Walraven  C.  The association of frailty with outcomes and resource use after emergency general surgery: a population-based cohort study.  Anesth Analg. 2017;124(5):1653-1661. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001960PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Fried  TR, Bradley  EH, Towle  VR, Allore  H.  Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients.  N Engl J Med. 2002;346(14):1061-1066. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa012528PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
van der Windt  DJ, Bou-Samra  P, Dadashzadeh  ER, Chen  X, Varley  PR, Tsung  A.  Preoperative Risk Analysis Index for frailty predicts short-term outcomes after hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.  HPB (Oxford). 2018;20(12):1181-1188. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2018.05.016PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Esses  G, Andreopoulos  E, Lin  HM, Arya  S, Deiner  S.  A comparison of three frailty indices in predicting morbidity and mortality after on-pump aortic valve replacement.  Anesth Analg. 2018;126(1):39-45. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002411PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Hall  DE, Arya  S, Schmid  KK,  et al.  Association of a frailty screening initiative with postoperative survival at 30, 180, and 365 days.  JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):233-240. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Isharwal  S, Johanning  JM, Dwyer  JG, Schimid  KK, LaGrange  CA.  Preoperative frailty predicts postoperative complications and mortality in urology patients.  World J Urol. 2017;35(1):21-26. doi:10.1007/s00345-016-1845-zPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Ernst  KF, Hall  DE, Schmid  KK,  et al.  Surgical palliative care consultations over time in relationship to systemwide frailty screening.  JAMA Surg. 2014;149(11):1121-1126. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1393PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Berian  JR, Mohanty  S, Ko  CY, Rosenthal  RA, Robinson  TN.  Association of loss of independence with readmission and death after discharge in older patients after surgical procedures.  JAMA Surg. 2016;151(9):e161689. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1689PubMedGoogle Scholar
41.
VanderWeele  TJ.  On the promotion of human flourishing.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(31):8148-8156. doi:10.1073/pnas.1702996114PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
VanderWeele  TJ, McNeely  E, Koh  HK.  Reimagining health-flourishing.  JAMA. 2019;321(17):1667-1668. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.3035PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    2 Comments for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    Differentiation between emergency and elective surgery for operative stress assessment
    Rahul Gupta, MBBS, MS, MCh | Synergy Institute of Medical Sciences
    I read with interest the article by Shinall et al on the association between patient fraility and operative stress. But on reading the details about the operative stress score, I did not understand how the stress associated with emergency surgery was taken in to account. For example, a given patient undergoing emergency open colectomy for intestinal obstruction or perforation is obviously having higher operative stress compared to a patient undergoing elective open colectomy. The authors need to clarify whether this aspect was taken in to consideration while preparing operative risk score.
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    Response to Dr. Gupta on behalf of the authors
    Amalia Cochran, MD | The Ohio State University
    We thank the reader for this perceptive comment, and we agree that the emergent vs. elective status of the surgical procedure is of paramount importance. In developing the Operative Stress Score, the raters were asked to consider the stress associated with the procedure in an elective setting. The dataset used for the published analysis included all surgeries included in VASQIP for the specified years, both elective and emergent. Our intention was to provide an analysis that was generalizable to the broadest sample of surgery as actually performed across the VA. However, this reader is not the first to inquire about the relative impact of emergency status on our analysis, and thus we have just completed subgroup analyses that examine the relationship of operative stress, frailty and mortality in elective and emergent contexts. In brief, although mortality is higher among emergent surgeries, the same pattern of mortality and frailty across all ranges of operative stress is observed in both the emergent and elective sub-samples. We have submitted these findings for consideration as a peer-reviewed publication.
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    Original Investigation
    November 13, 2019

    Association of Preoperative Patient Frailty and Operative Stress With Postoperative Mortality

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
    • 2Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
    • 3Surgical Service Line, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California
    • 4Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • 5Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • 6Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • 7Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
    • 8Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
    • 9Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
    • 10Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio
    • 11South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio
    • 12Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
    • 13Nebraska Western Iowa Veterans Affairs Health System, Omaha
    • 14Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
    • 15Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • 16Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
    • 17Deparment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
    • 18Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
    • 19Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • 20Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • 21Division of Urology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
    • 22Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
    • 23Perioperative Surgical Home, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
    • 24Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
    • 25Department of Anesthesiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
    • 26Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
    • 27Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
    • 28Department of Neurosurgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
    • 29Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    JAMA Surg. 2020;155(1):e194620. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4620
    Key Points

    Question  Is frailty associated with increased risk of postoperative mortality across all levels of operative stress?

    Findings  In this cohort study of 432 828 unique patients, frailty was associated with increased 30-, 90-, and 180-day mortality across all levels of operative stress. Mortality among patients with frailty after low- and moderate-stress procedures was substantially higher than mortality rates usually associated with high-risk surgical procedures.

    Meaning  The findings suggest that even minor surgical procedures are associated with high risk for patients with frailty and that surgeons and referring physicians should consider whether the potential benefits of surgery warrant the increased risk.

    Abstract

    Importance  Patients with frailty have higher risk for postoperative mortality and complications; however, most research has focused on small groups of high-risk procedures. The associations among frailty, operative stress, and mortality are poorly understood.

    Objective  To assess the association between frailty and mortality at varying levels of operative stress as measured by the Operative Stress Score, a novel measure created for this study.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  This retrospective cohort study included veterans in the Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program from April 1, 2010, through March 31, 2014, who underwent a noncardiac surgical procedure at Veterans Health Administration Hospitals and had information available on vital status (whether the patient was alive or deceased) at 1 year postoperatively. A Delphi consensus method was used to stratify surgical procedures into 5 categories of physiologic stress.

    Exposures  Frailty as measured by the Risk Analysis Index and operative stress as measured by the Operative Stress Score.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Postoperative mortality at 30, 90, and 180 days.

    Results  Of 432 828 unique patients (401 453 males [92.8%]; mean (SD) age, 61.0 [12.9] years), 36 579 (8.5%) were frail and 9113 (2.1%) were very frail. The 30-day mortality rate among patients who were frail and underwent the lowest-stress surgical procedures (eg, cystoscopy) was 1.55% (95% CI, 1.20%-1.97%) and among patients with frailty who underwent the moderate-stress surgical procedures (eg, laparoscopic cholecystectomy) was 5.13% (95% CI, 4.79%-5.48%); these rates exceeded the 1% mortality rate often used to define high-risk surgery. Among patients who were very frail, 30-day mortality rates were higher after the lowest-stress surgical procedures (10.34%; 95% CI, 7.73%-13.48%) and after the moderate-stress surgical procedures (18.74%; 95% CI, 17.72%-19.80%). For patients who were frail and very frail, mortality continued to increase at 90 and 180 days, reaching 43.00% (95% CI, 41.69%-44.32%) for very frail patients at 180 days after moderate-stress surgical procedures.

    Conclusions and Relevance  We developed a novel operative stress score to quantify physiologic stress for surgical procedures. Patients who were frail and very frail had high rates of postoperative mortality across all levels of the Operative Stress Score. These findings suggest that frailty screening should be applied universally because low- and moderate-stress procedures may be high risk among patients who are frail.

    ×