Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Coronavirus Disease 2019 | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Views 1,211
Citations 0
Comment & Response
January 27, 2021

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Coronavirus Disease 2019

Author Affiliations
  • 1Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University ECMO Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
JAMA Surg. 2021;156(4):400. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6628

To the Editor We read with great interest the Research Letter by Mustafa et al.1 The authors interpret their findings as demonstrating “promising outcomes” and as suggesting safety and effectiveness of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, several clarifications are required before valid conclusions are possible.

Eleven patients (28%) who were still in the intensive care unit (8 [20%] still receiving ECMO) were not included in the final data analysis. Thus, the validity of the outcome data is questionable. For example, the reported mortality of 15% is unusually low. In a recent report of 83 patients receiving ECMO for severe COVID-19–associated acute respiratory distress syndrome in a high-volume ECMO center experienced in the care of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, 30 patients (36%) died at 60 days.2 Obviously, the 11 patients still in the intensive care unit at the time of data analysis need to be included in the final analysis, especially because survival was the primary end point. After all, if all of them should have subsequently died, the mortality would be 42.5%. In any case, a possible explanation for the considerable discrepancy in mortality between this and other reports would be welcomed.

The authors state that complications had been minimal. Besides the fact that minimal is not quantified, leaving the true incidence of complications unknown, the reported low incidence of complications in this population is remarkable. By contrast, of the 83 patients studied by Schmidt et al,2 4 patients (5%) and 11 patients (13%) developed hemorrhagic stroke and intravascular hemolysis, respectively, and 64 (77%) and 38 (46%) required transfusion of packed red blood cells and kidney replacement therapy, respectively. Because anticoagulation is an important treatment component of severe COVID-19,3,4 details regarding the anticoagulation management would be very helpful.

The authors report a mean time of 13 days from ECMO initiation to extubation. However, Figure, B in their article1 suggests that 5 of 40 patients (12.5%) had not been extubated by the end of the observation period. This would imply that the reported mean time underestimates the ultimate intubation times. Thus, information regarding the final intubation times would be important.

In summary, while the reported outcomes seem promising, additional information is required before the findings can be placed in proper clinical perspective. Although the application of ECMO in COVID-19–associated acute respiratory distress syndrome has become an accepted option, the degree to which it should be used remains controversial.5

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Johannes Kalbhenn, MD, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany (johannes.kalbhenn@uniklinik-freiburg.de).

Published Online: January 27, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6628

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

References
1.
Mustafa  AK, Alexander  PJ, Joshi  DJ,  et al.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for patients with COVID-19 in severe respiratory failure.   JAMA Surg. 2020;155(10):990-992. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3950PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Schmidt  M, Hajage  D, Lebreton  G,  et al; Groupe de Recherche Clinique en REanimation et Soins intensifs du Patient en Insuffisance Respiratoire aiguE (GRC-RESPIRE) Sorbonne Université; Paris-Sorbonne ECMO-COVID investigators.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.   Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(11):1121-1131. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30328-3 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Tang  N, Bai  H, Chen  X, Gong  J, Li  D, Sun  Z.  Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy.   J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(5):1094-1099. doi:10.1111/jth.14817PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Rico-Mesa  JS, Rosas  D, Ahmadian-Tehrani  A, White  A, Anderson  AS, Chilton  R.  The role of anticoagulation in COVID-19-induced hypercoagulability.   Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020;22(7):53. doi:10.1007/s11886-020-01328-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Shekar  K, Slutsky  AS, Brodie  D.  ECMO for severe ARDS associated with COVID-19: now we know we can, but should we?   Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(11):1066-1068. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30357-X PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×