Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices Implanted Surgically: A Retrospective Study on Early and Late Complications | Medical Devices and Equipment | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.236.187.155. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Kock  HJPietsch  MKrause  UWilke  HEigler  FW Implanted vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems.  World J Surg. 1998;2212- 16Google ScholarCrossref
2.
Poorter  RLLauw  FNBemelman  WABakker  PJTaat  CWVeenhof  CH Complications of an implantable venous access device (Port-a-Cath) during intermittent continuous infusion of chemotherapy.  Eur J Cancer. 1996;322262- 2266Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Ballarini  CIntra  MPisani Ceretti  A  et al.  Complications of subcutaneous infusion port in the general oncology population.  Oncology. 1999;5697- 102Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Niederhuber  JEEnsminger  WGyves  JWLiepman  MCozzi  RN Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment.  Surgery. 1982;92706- 711Google Scholar
5.
Biffi  Rde Braud  FOrsi  F  et al.  Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy: a prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.  Ann Oncol. 1998;9767- 773Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Aldrighetti  LPaganelli  MCaterini  RCatena  MRonzoni  MFerla  G Safety and efficiency of totally implantable devices for prolonged venous access: a prospective study.  J Chemother. 1996;8393- 396Google Scholar
7.
Kincaid  EHDavis  PWChang  MCFenstermaker  JMPennell  TC "Blind" placement of long-term central venous access devices: report of 589 consecutive procedures.  Am Surg. 1999;65520- 524Google Scholar
8.
Klotz  HPSchopke  WKohler  APestalozzi  BLargiader  F Catheter fracture: a rare complication of totally implantable subclavian venous access device.  J Surg Oncol. 1996;62222- 225Google ScholarCrossref
9.
Di Carlo  IFisichella  PRussello  DPuleo  SLatteri  F Catheter fracture and cardiac migration: a rare complication of totally implantable venous device (TIVD) placement.  J Surg Oncol. 2000;73172- 173Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Petersen  JDelaney  JHBrakstad  MTRowbotham  RKBagley  CM  Jr Silicone venous access devices positioned with their tips high in the superior vena cava are more likely to malfunction.  Am J Surg. 1999;17838- 41Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Gladwin  MTSlonim  ALanducci  DLGutierrez  DCCunnion  RE Cannulation of the internal jugular vein: is postprocedural chest radiography always necessary?  Crit Care Med. 1999;271819- 1823Google ScholarCrossref
12.
De Cicco  MMatovic  MBalestreri  L  et al.  Central venous thrombosis: an early and frequent complication in cancer patients bearing long-term silastic catheter: a prospective study.  Thromb Res. 1997;86101- 113Google ScholarCrossref
13.
Xiang  DZVerbeken  EKVan Lommel  ATStas  MDe Wever  I Composition and formation of the sleeve enveloping a central venous catheter.  J Vasc Surg. 1998;28260- 271Google ScholarCrossref
Original Article
September 2001

Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices Implanted Surgically: A Retrospective Study on Early and Late Complications

Author Affiliations

From the First Surgical Clinic (Drs Di Carlo, La Greca, Russello, Puleo, and Latteri) and the Department of Radiology (Dr Privitera), University of Catania; and the Department of Clinical Oncology, San Luigi Hospital (Dr Cordio), Catania, Italy.

Arch Surg. 2001;136(9):1050-1053. doi:10.1001/archsurg.136.9.1050
Abstract

Background  The techniques used for the implantation of totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) are the percutaneous approach and surgical cutdown; however, the choice is still controversial.

Hypothesis  The surgical cutdown approach may be beneficial to reduce the rate of complications.

Design  Retrospective review.

Setting  A university hospital and a tertiary referral center.

Patients  Patients undergoing a TIVAD implant at the First Surgical Clinic of the University of Catania in Catania, Italy, between January 1995 and December 1999, were considered for the study. All of the devices were implanted in an operating room under fluoroscopic control. The vein of choice was the cephalic vein. When the cephalic vein was not suitable for implantation, the external jugular vein or the axillary vein and its branches were used. The percutaneous approach to the subclavian vein or internal jugular vein was considered a last resort to implant a catheter.

Results  During the study period, 346 TIVADs were implanted in 344 patients. The procedure was performed with local anesthesia in 341 cases (98.5%), and only 2 patients (0.6%) required sedation for psychological reasons. Three patients (0.9%) had their TIVAD placed during a laparotomy. In 326 patients (94.2%), the devices were implanted in the cephalic vein. In the remaining cases, other veins were used with surgical cutdown. The mean time for the procedure was 15 minutes. Percutaneous access was never used, and no early mechanical complications were recorded. Only 6 patients (1.8%) in our study group had late complications (1 case of migration of the catheter, 2 cases of infection, and 3 cases of withdrawal occlusion). The catheter life ranged from 6 to 1487 days (mean time, 348 days).

Conclusion  Our results confirm the safety, speed, and low cost of the open cutdown technique. This surgical procedure avoids both early and late complications that frequently occur with percutaneous access. Surgical cutdown should be considered the technique of choice to implant the TIVAD, especially in cancer patients.

×