[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
1.
Schmidt  HGBauer  JWiessner  VSchonekas  H Endoscopic aspects of choledochoceles.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;43143- 146Google Scholar
2.
Moreno Gonzalez  EGarcia Garcia  I  et al.  Choledochal cyst resection and reconstruction by biliary-jejuno-duodenal diversion.  World J Surg. 1989;13232- 237Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Watanatittan  SNiramis  R Choledochal cyst: review of 74 pediatric cases.  J Med Assoc Thai. 1998;81586- 595Google Scholar
4.
Chen  HMJan  YYChen  MF  et al.  Surgical treatment of choledochal cyst in adults: results and long-term follow-up.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;431492- 1499Google Scholar
5.
Juttijudata  PChiemchaisri  CPalavatana  CChurnratanakul  S Causes of cholestasis in Thailand: a study of 276 consecutive patients.  Am J Surg. 1984;147360- 366Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Alonso-Lej  FRever  WBJPessagno  DJ Congenital choledochal cysts, with a report of 2, and an analysis of 94 cases.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1959;1081- 30Google Scholar
7.
Todani  TWatanabe  YNarusue  MTabuchi  KOkajima  K Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst.  Am J Surg. 1977;134263- 269Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Gorenstein  LStrasberg  SM Etiology of choledochal cysts: two instructive cases.  Can J Surg. 1985;28363- 367Google Scholar
9.
Caroli  JSoupalt  JKossakowski  LPlocker  LParadowska  M La digitation polykstique congenitale des voico biliares intrahepatiques; essai de classification.  Semin Hop Paris. 1958;34488- 495Google Scholar
10.
Babbitt  DP Congenital choledochal cysts: new etiological concepts on anomalous relationships of the common bile duct and pancreatic bulb.  Ann Radiol (Paris). 1969;12231- 240Google Scholar
11.
Zhao  LLi  ZMa  H  et al.  Congenital choledochal cyst with pancreatitis.  Chin Med J (Engl). 1999;112637- 640Google Scholar
12.
Iwai  NYanagihara  JTokiwa  KShimotake  TNakamura  K Congenital choledochal dilatation with emphasis on pathophysiology of the biliary tract.  Ann Surg. 1992;21527- 30Google ScholarCrossref
13.
Imazu  MIwai  NTokiwa  KShimotake  TKimura  OOno  S Factors of biliary carcinogenesis in choledochal cysts.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001;1124- 27Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Schweizer  PSchweizer  M Pancreaticobiliary long common channel syndrome and congenital anomalous dilatation of the choledochal duct: study of 46 patients.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1993;315- 21Google ScholarCrossref
15.
Ohkawa  HSawaguchi  SYamazaki  YIshikawa  AKikuchi  M Experimental analysis of the effect of anomalous pancreaticobilliary ductal union.  J Pediatr Surg. 1982;177- 13Google ScholarCrossref
16.
Swisher  SGCates  JAHunt  KK  et al.  Pancreatitis associated with adult choledochal cysts.  Pancreas. 1994;9633- 637Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Stringer  MDDhawan  ADavenport  MMieli-Vergani  GMowat  APHoward  ER Choledochal cysts: lessons from a 20 year experience.  Arch Dis Child. 1995;73528- 531Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Song  HKKim  MHMyung  SJ  et al.  Choledochal cyst associated the with anomalous union of pancreaticobiliary duct (AUPBD) has a more grave clinical course than choledochal cyst alone.  Korean J Intern Med. 1999;141- 8Google Scholar
19.
Davenport  MStringer  MDHoward  ER Biliary amylase and congenital choledochal dilatation.  J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30474- 477Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Yamashiro  YSato  MShimizu  TOguchi  SMiyano  T How great is the incidence of truly congenital common bile duct dilatation?  J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28622- 625Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Spitz  L Experimental production of cystic dilatation of the comon bile duct in lambs.  J Pediatr Surg. 1977;1239Google ScholarCrossref
22.
Tsang  TMTam  PKChamberlain  P Obliteration of the distal bile duct in the development of congenital choledochal cyst.  J Pediatr Surg. 1994;291582- 1583Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Ponce  JGarrigues  VSala  TPertejo  VBerenguer  J Endoscopic biliary manometry in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and in patients with cystic dilatation of the bile ducts.  Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34367- 371Google ScholarCrossref
24.
Iwai  NTokiwa  KTsuto  TYanagihara  JTakahashi  T Biliary manometry in choledochal cyst with abnormal choledochopancreatico ductal junction.  J Pediatr Surg. 1986;21873- 876Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Kusunoki  MSaitoh  NYamamura  TFujita  STakahashi  TUtsunomiya  J Choledochal cysts: oligoganglionosis in the narrow portion of the choledochus.  Arch Surg. 1988;123984- 986Google ScholarCrossref
26.
Shimotake  TIwai  NYanagihara  JInoue  KFushiki  S Innervation patterns in congenital biliary dilatation.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1995;5265- 270Google ScholarCrossref
27.
Tyler  KLSokol  RJOberhaus  SM  et al.  Detection of reovirus RNA in hepatobiliary tissues from patients with extrahepatic biliary atresia and choledochal cysts.  Hepatology. 1998;271475- 1482Google ScholarCrossref
28.
Uchida  MTsukahara  MFuji  TFujihara  TUeki  KKajii  T Discordance for anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction and congenital biliary dilatation in a set of monozygotic twins.  J Pediatr Surg. 1992;271563- 1564Google ScholarCrossref
29.
Iwata  FUchida  AMiyaki  T  et al.  Familial occurrence of congenital bile duct cysts.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;13316- 319Google ScholarCrossref
30.
Lane  GJYamataka  AKobayashi  HSegawa  OMiyano  T Different types of congenital biliary dilatation in dizygotic twins.  Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15403- 404Google ScholarCrossref
31.
Nakamura  TOkada  AHigaki  JTojo  HOkamoto  M Pancreaticobiliary maljunction-associated pancreatitis: an experimental study on the activation of pancreatic phospholipase A2.  World J Surg. 1996;20543- 550Google ScholarCrossref
32.
Todani  TNarusue  MWatanabe  YTabuchi  KOkajima  K Management of congenital choledochal cyst with intrahepatic involvement.  Ann Surg. 1978;187272- 280Google ScholarCrossref
33.
Sherman  PKolster  EDavies  CStringer  DWeber  J Choledochal cysts: heterogeneity of clinical presentation.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986;5867- 872Google ScholarCrossref
34.
Samuel  MSpitz  L Choledochal cyst: varied clinical presentations and long-term results of surgery.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1996;678- 81Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Rattan  KNKhurana  PBudhiraja  SMalik  VPandit  SK Choledochal cyst: a 10-year experience.  Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67657- 659Google ScholarCrossref
36.
Lipsett  PAPitt  HAColombani  PMBoitnott  JKCameron  JL Choledochal cyst disease: a changing pattern of presentation.  Ann Surg. 1994;220644- 652Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Cheng  MTChang  MHHsu  HY  et al.  Choledochal cyst in infancy: a follow-up study.  Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2000;4113- 17Google Scholar
38.
Redkar  RDavenport  MHoward  ER Antenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the biliary tract.  J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33700- 704Google ScholarCrossref
39.
Mackenzie  TCHowell  LJFlake  AWAdzick  NS The management of prenatally diagnosed choledochal cysts.  J Pediatr Surg. 2001;361241- 1243Google ScholarCrossref
40.
Matsubara  HOya  NSuzuki  Y  et al.  Is it possible to differentiate between choledochal cyst and congenital biliary atresia (type I cyst) by antenatal ultrasonography?  Fetal Diagn Ther. 1997;12306- 308Google ScholarCrossref
41.
Rha  SYStovroff  MCGlick  PLAllen  JERicketts  RR Choledochal cysts: a ten year experience.  Am Surg. 1996;6230- 34Google Scholar
42.
Jan  YYChen  HMChen  MF Malignancy in choledochal cysts.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49100- 103Google Scholar
43.
Karanikas  IDKoundourakis  SSMacheras  ANPanagiotidis  HCLiakakos  TDDendrinos  SS Long-term results of management of type I choledochal cysts in adults.  Acta Chir Belg. 1997;9713- 18Google Scholar
44.
Lin  JTHChen  YHNi  YHLai  HSPeng  SS Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography diagnosed pancreatitis associated choledochal cyst: report of one case.  Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2001;42363- 366Google Scholar
45.
Weisser  MBennek  JHormann  D Choledochocele: a rare cause of necrotising pancreatitis in childhood.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2000;10258- 264Google ScholarCrossref
46.
Seema  Not AvailableSharma  ASeth  ATaluja  VBagga  DAneja  S Spontaneous rupture of choledochal cyst.  Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67155- 156Google ScholarCrossref
47.
Lin  SLShan  KMHung  YBNg  SHLin  CY Choledochal cyst associated with acute acalculous cholecystitis.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;31307- 308Google ScholarCrossref
48.
Ando  KMiyano  TKohno  STakamizawa  SLane  G Spontaneous perforation of choledochal cyst: a study of 13 cases.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1998;823- 25Google ScholarCrossref
49.
Sato  MIshida  HKonno  K  et al.  Choledochal cyst due to anomalous pancreatobiliary junction in the adult: sonographic findings.  Abdom Imaging. 2001;26395- 400Google ScholarCrossref
50.
Kim  JELee  JKLee  KT  et al.  The clinical significance of common bile-duct dilatation in patients without biliary symptoms or causative lesions on ultrasonography.  Endoscopy. 2001;33495- 500Google ScholarCrossref
51.
Liu  DCRodriguez  JAMeric  FGeiger  JL Laparoscopic excision of a rare type II choledochal cyst: case report and review of the literature.  J Pediatr Surg. 2000;351117- 1119Google ScholarCrossref
52.
Ono  STokiwa  KAoi  SIwai  NNakanoin  H A bleeding tendency as the first symptom of a choledochal cyst.  Pediatr Surg Int. 2000;16111- 112Google ScholarCrossref
53.
Ramos  ACastello  JPinto  I Intestinal intussusception as a presenting feature of choledochocele.  Gastrointest Radiol. 1990;15211- 214Google ScholarCrossref
54.
Martin  LWRowe  GA Portal hypertension secondary to choledochal cyst.  Ann Surg. 1979;190638- 639Google ScholarCrossref
55.
Lee  HCYeung  CYChang  PYSheu  JCWang  NL Dilatation of the biliary tree in children: sonographic diagnosis and its clinical significance.  J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19177- 184Google Scholar
56.
Gubernick  JARosenberg  HKIlaslan  HKessler  A US approach to jaundice in infants and children.  Radiographics. 2000;20173- 195Google ScholarCrossref
57.
Kim  WSKim  IOYeon  KMPark  KWSeo  JKKim  CJ Choledochal cyst with or without biliary atresia in neonates and young infants: US differentiation.  Radiology. 1998;209465- 469Google Scholar
58.
Aggarwal  SKumar  ARoy  SBandhu  S Massive dilatation of the common bile duct resembling a choledochal cyst.  Trop Gastroenterol. 2001;22219- 220Google Scholar
59.
Rosenfield  NGriscom  NT Choledochal cysts: roentgenographic techniques.  Radiology. 1975;114113- 119Google Scholar
60.
Postema  RRHazebroek  FW Choledochal cysts in children: a review of 28 years of treatment in a Dutch children's hospital.  Eur J Surg. 1999;1651159- 1161Google ScholarCrossref
61.
Oshiumi  YNakayama  CMorita  KNumaguchi  YKoga  IMatsuura  K Serial scintigraphy of choledochal cysts using 131I-rose bengal and 131I-bromsulphalein.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1977;128769- 771Google ScholarCrossref
62.
Johnson  KAlton  HMChapman  S Evaluation of mebrofenin hepatoscintigraphy in neonatal-onset jaundice.  Pediatr Radiol. 1998;28937- 941Google ScholarCrossref
63.
Rajnish  AGambhir  SDas  BKSaxena  R Classifying choledochal cysts using hepatobiliary scintigraphy.  Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25996- 999Google ScholarCrossref
64.
Groebli  YMeyer  JLTschantz  P Choledochocele demonstrated by computed tomographic cholangiography: report of a case.  Surg Today. 2000;30272- 276Google ScholarCrossref
65.
De Backer  AIVan den Abbeele  KDe Schepper  AMVan Baarle  A Choledochocele: diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging.  Abdom Imaging. 2000;25508- 510Google ScholarCrossref
66.
Lam  WWLam  TPSaing  HChan  FLChan  KL MR cholangiography and CT cholangiography of pediatric patients with choledochal cysts.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173401- 405Google ScholarCrossref
67.
Park  KBAuh  YHKim  JH  et al.  Diagnostic pitfalls in the cholangiographic diagnosis of choledochoceles: cholangiographic quality and its effect on visualization.  Abdom Imaging. 2001;2648- 54Google ScholarCrossref
68.
Kabra  VAgarwal  MAdukai  TKDixit  VKAgrawal  AKShukla  VK Choledochal cyst: a changing pattern of presentation.  ANZ J Surg. 2001;71159- 161Google ScholarCrossref
69.
Kim  MHMyung  SJLee  SK  et al.  Ballooning of the papilla during contrast injection: the semaphore of a choledochocele.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48258- 262Google ScholarCrossref
70.
Kim  SHLim  JHYoon  HKHan  BKLee  SKKim  YI Choledochal cyst: comparison of MR and conventional cholangiography.  Clin Radiol. 2000;55378- 383Google ScholarCrossref
71.
Irie  HHonda  HJimi  M  et al.  Value of MR cholangiopancreatography in evaluating choledochal cysts.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;1711381- 1385Google ScholarCrossref
72.
Govil  SJustus  AKorah  IPerakath  AZachariah  NSen  S Choledochal cysts: evaluation with MR cholangiography.  Abdom Imaging. 1998;23616- 619Google ScholarCrossref
73.
Miyazaki  TYamashita  YTang  YTsuchigame  TTakahashi  MSera  Y Single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography of neonates, infants, and young children.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;17033- 37Google ScholarCrossref
74.
Nambirajan  LTaneja  PSingh  MKMitra  DKBhatnagar  V The liver in choledochal cyst.  Trop Gastroenterol. 2000;21135- 139Google Scholar
75.
Suita  SShono  KKinugasa  YKubota  MMatsuo  S Influence of age on the presentation and outcome of choledochal cyst.  J Pediatr Surg. 1999;341765- 1768Google ScholarCrossref
76.
Liu  CLFan  STLo  CMLam  CMPoon  RTWong  J Choledochal cysts in adults.  Arch Surg. 2002;137465- 468Google ScholarCrossref
77.
Jan  YYChen  HMChen  MF Malignancy in choledochal cysts.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47337- 340Google Scholar
78.
Stain  SCGuthrie  CRYellin  AEDonovan  AJ Choledochal cyst in the adult.  Ann Surg. 1995;222128- 133Google ScholarCrossref
79.
Ohtsuka  TInoue  KOhuchida  J  et al.  Carcinoma arising in choledochocele.  Endoscopy. 2001;33614- 619Google ScholarCrossref
80.
Tsuchiya  RHarada  NIto  TFurukawa  MYoshihiro  I Malignant tumors in choledochal cysts.  Ann Surg. 1977;18622- 28Google ScholarCrossref
81.
Iwai  NDeguchi  EYanagihara  J  et al.  Cancer arising in a choledochal cyst in a 12-year-old girl.  J Pediatr Surg. 1990;251261- 1263Google ScholarCrossref
82.
Kato  OHattori  KSuzuki  TTachino  FYuasa  T Clinical significance of anomalous pancreaticobiliary union.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1983;2994- 98Google ScholarCrossref
83.
Chijiiwa  KKimura  HTanaka  M Malignant potential of the gallbladder in patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction: the difference in risk between patients with and without choledochal cyst.  Int Surg. 1995;8061- 64Google Scholar
84.
Komi  NTamura  TTsuge  SMiyoshi  YUdaka  HTakehara  H Relation of patient age to premalignant alterations in choledochal cyst epithelium: histochemical and immunohistochemical studies.  J Pediatr Surg. 1986;21430- 433Google ScholarCrossref
85.
Tajiri  H Choledochocele-containing stones.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;911046- 1048Google Scholar
86.
Pisano  GDonlon  JBPlatell  CHall  JC Cholangiocarcinoma in a type III choledochal cyst.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1991;61855- 857Google ScholarCrossref
87.
Kawamoto  SHiraoka  TMaruta  SWatanabe  EKanemitsu  KTsuji  T A case of early cancer in cystic intrahepatic duct associated with congenital choledochal cyst.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45428- 432Google Scholar
88.
Tajiri  KTakenawa  HYamaoka  KYamane  MMarumo  FSato  C Choledochal cyst with adenocarcinoma in the cystically dilated intrahepatic bile duct.  Abdom Imaging. 1997;22190- 193Google ScholarCrossref
89.
Spitz  L Choledochal cyst.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;147444- 452Google Scholar
90.
Muakkasah  KObeid  SSlim  M Congenital choledochal cysts.  Arch Surg. 1976;1111112- 1114Google ScholarCrossref
91.
Nagorney  DMMcIlrath  DCAdson  MA Choledochal cysts in adults: clinical management.  Surgery. 1984;96656- 663Google Scholar
92.
Kouraklis  GMisiakos  EGlinavou  AKaratzas  GGogas  JSkalkeas  G Cystic dilatations of the common bile duct in adults.  HPB Surg. 1996;1091- 95Google ScholarCrossref
93.
Takiff  HStone  MFonkalsrud  EW Choledochal cysts: results of primary surgery and need for reoperation in young patients.  Am J Surg. 1985;150141- 146Google ScholarCrossref
94.
Chijiiwa  KKoga  A Surgical management and long-term follow-up of patients with choledochal cysts.  Am J Surg. 1993;165238- 242Google ScholarCrossref
95.
Chaudhary  ADhar  PSachdev  A Reoperative surgery for choledochal cysts.  Br J Surg. 1997;84781- 784Google ScholarCrossref
96.
Kaneko  KAndo  HWatanabe  Y  et al.  Secondary excision of choledochal cysts after previous cyst-enterostomies.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;462772- 2775Google Scholar
97.
Lai  HSDuh  YCChen  WJ  et al.  Manifestations and surgical treatment of choledochal cyst in different age group patients.  J Formos Med Assoc. 1997;96242- 246Google Scholar
98.
Ishibashi  TKasahara  KYasuda  YNagai  HMakino  SKanazawa  K Malignant change in the biliary tract after excision of choledochal cyst.  Br J Surg. 1997;841687- 1691Google ScholarCrossref
99.
Watanabe  YToki  ATodani  T Bile duct cancer developed after cyst excision for choledochal cyst.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6207- 212Google ScholarCrossref
100.
Eriguchi  NAoyagi  SOkuda  K  et al.  Carcinoma arising in the pancreas 17 years after primary excision of a choledochal cysts: report of a case.  Surg Today. 2001;31534- 537Google ScholarCrossref
101.
Kurokawa  YHasuike  YTsujinaka  T  et al.  Carcinoma of the head of the pancreas after excision of a choledochal cyst.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48578- 580Google Scholar
102.
Fujisaki  SAkiyama  TMiyake  H  et al.  A case of carcinoma associated with the remained intrapancreatic biliary tract 17 years after the primary excision of a choledochal cyst.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;461655- 1659Google Scholar
103.
Ando  HKaneko  KIto  T  et al.  Complete excision of the intrapancreatic portion of choledochal cysts.  J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183317- 321Google Scholar
104.
Jesudason  SRGovil  SMathai  VKuruvilla  RMuthusami  JC Choledochal cysts in adults.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79410- 413Google Scholar
105.
Lopez  RRPinson  CWCampbell  JRHarrison  MKaton  RM Variation in management based on type of choledochal cyst.  Am J Surg. 1991;161612- 615Google ScholarCrossref
106.
Hewitt  PMKrige  JEBornman  PCTerblanche  J Choledochal cysts in adults.  Br J Surg. 1995;82382- 385Google ScholarCrossref
107.
Belli  GRotondano  GD'Agostino  AIannelli  AMarano  ISantangelo  ML Cystic dilation of extrahepatic bile ducts in adulthood: diagnosis, surgical treatment and long-term results.  HPB Surg. 1998;10379- 385Google ScholarCrossref
108.
Kobayashi  SAsano  TYamasaki  MKenmochi  TNakagohri  TOchiai  T Risk of bile duct carcinogenesis after excision of extrahepatic bile ducts in pancreaticobiliary maljunction.  Surgery. 1999;126939- 944Google ScholarCrossref
109.
Nakayama  HMasuda  HUgajin  WKoshinaga  TFukuzawa  M Left hepatic lobectomy for type IV-A choledochal cyst.  Am Surg. 2000;661020- 1022Google Scholar
110.
Shito  MShintoku  JMiyazaki  HMukai  M Asymptomatic intrahepatic choledochal cyst associated with chronic active hepatitis C.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;452356- 2358Google Scholar
111.
Thambi Dorai  CRVisvanathan  RMcAll  GL Type IVa choledochal cysts: surgical management and literature review.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1991;61505- 510Google ScholarCrossref
112.
Elton  EHanson  BLBiber  BPHowell  DA Dilated common channel syndrome: endoscopic diagnosis, treatment, and relationship to choledochocele formation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47471- 478Google ScholarCrossref
113.
Adamek  HESchilling  DWeitz  MRiemann  JF Choledochocele imaged with magnetic resonance cholangiography.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;951082- 1083Google ScholarCrossref
114.
Siegel  EGFolsch  UR Primary sclerosing cholangitis mimicking choledocal cyst type 1 in a young patient.  Endoscopy. 1999;31200- 203Google ScholarCrossref
115.
Samavedy  RSherman  SLehman  GA Endoscopic therapy in anomalous pancreatobiliary duct junction.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50623- 627Google ScholarCrossref
116.
Todani  TWatanabe  YUrushihara  NNoda  TMorotomi  Y Biliary complications after excisional procedure for choledochal cyst.  J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30478- 481Google ScholarCrossref
117.
Henne-Bruns  DKremer  BThonke  FGrimm  HSoehendra  N "Endoscopy friendly" resection technique of choledochal cysts.  Endoscopy. 1993;25176- 178Google ScholarCrossref
118.
Schimpl  GAigner  RSorantin  EMayr  JSauer  H Comparison of hepaticoantrostomy and hepaticojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction after resection of a choledochal cyst.  Pediatr Surg Int. 1997;12271- 275Google ScholarCrossref
119.
Malt  RA Obstructing phytobezoar of an intrahepatic bile duct.  Arch Surg. 1979;11486- 87Google ScholarCrossref
120.
Delarue  AChappuis  JPEsposito  C  et al.  Is the appendix graft suitable for routine biliary surgery in children?  J Pediatr Surg. 2000;351312- 1316Google ScholarCrossref
121.
Todani  TWatanabe  YToki  AOgura  KWang  ZQ Co-existing biliary anomalies and anatomical variants in choledochal cyst.  Br J Surg. 1998;85760- 763Google ScholarCrossref
122.
Hamada  YSato  MTakada  KHioki  K Spiral computed tomography for bilioenteric anastomotic stricture.  Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;13424- 425Google ScholarCrossref
123.
Uno  KTsuchida  YKawarasaki  HOhmiya  HHonna  T Development of intrahepatic cholelithiasis long after primary excision of choledochal cysts.  J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183583- 588Google Scholar
124.
Ando  HIto  TKaneko  KSeo  TIto  F Intrahepatic bile duct stenosis causing intrahepatic calculi formation following excision of a choledochal cyst.  J Am Coll Surg. 1996;18356- 60Google Scholar
125.
Hsu  RKYu  ALee  JGLeung  JW Pancreatitis caused by common bile duct stones in a 3-year-old boy with prior surgery for a choledochal cyst.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;961919- 1921Google ScholarCrossref
126.
Tsuchida  YTakahashi  ASuzuki  N  et al.  Development of intrahepatic biliary stones after excision of choledochal cysts.  J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37165- 167Google ScholarCrossref
127.
Yamataka  AOhshiro  KOkada  Y  et al.  Complications after cyst excision with hepaticoenterostomy for choledochal cysts and their surgical management in children versus adults.  J Pediatr Surg. 1997;321097- 1102Google ScholarCrossref
128.
Saing  HChan  KLMya  GHCheng  WFan  STChan  FL Cutaneous stoma in the roux limb of hepaticojejunostomy (hepaticocutaneous jejunostomy): useful access for intrahepatic stone extraction.  J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31247- 250Google ScholarCrossref
129.
Scudamore  CHHemming  AWTeare  JPFache  JSErb  SRWatkinson  AF Surgical management of choledochal cysts.  Am J Surg. 1994;167497- 500Google ScholarCrossref
130.
Tanaka  MShimizu  SMizumoto  K  et al.  Laparoscopically assisted resection of choledochal cyst and Roux-en-Y reconstruction.  Surg Endosc. 2001;15545- 552Google ScholarCrossref
131.
Watanabe  YSato  MTokui  KKoga  SYukumi  SKawachi  K Laparoscope-assisted minimally invasive treatment for choledochal cyst.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9415- 418Google ScholarCrossref
132.
Shimura  HTanaka  MShimizu  SMizumoto  K Laparoscopic treatment of congenital choledochal cyst.  Surg Endosc. 1998;121268- 1271Google ScholarCrossref
Review
March 2003

Management Dilemmas With Choledochal Cysts

Author Affiliations
 

Copyright 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2003

Arch Surg. 2003;138(3):333-339. doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.3.333
Abstract

Context  Choledochal cysts are rare and of unknown cause. Their presentation is protean, with the classical triad of pain, jaundice, and mass rarely seen. The potential complications are serious, including pancreatitis, cholangitis, and cholangiocarcinoma.

Objective  To present the current experience and evidence relating to all aspects of choledochal cysts to derive appropriate management recommendations.

Methods  Review of relevant literature in the English language indexed on MEDLINE.

Results  The elaboration of the classification of choledochal cysts. We describe the modes of presentation and optimal investigation and summarize the current theories on etiology and malignant transformation. The results of different management strategies are presented.

Conclusions  Choledochal cysts are often detected during the investigation of nonspecific symptoms, or even incidentally detected. Magnetic resonance imaging is the best imaging modality for the diagnosis and characterization of these cysts. Complete excision and hepaticojejenostomy is the management of choice.

CHOLEDOCHAL CYSTS are uncommon and of unknown cause, with an incidence of 0.1% even among adults referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) investigation.1 In a pediatric surgical unit in Spain, only 0.03% of the cases were for choledochal cyst disease.2 There is a higher incidence in females3,4 and they are more common in the Far East than in populations of Western European origin.5 The presentation is often vague and nonspecific, impeding prompt diagnosis. However, the diagnosis is facilitated by modern imaging techniques, and may be made at any time from the antenatal period to adult life. While some aspects of optimal management have been resolved, others remain controversial. The more severe complications of choledochal cyst disease include pancreatitis, cholangitis, biliary cirrhosis, and cholangiocarcinoma. This review considers the literature on choledochal cysts, concentrating particularly on current issues in management of the disease.

Classification

The most commonly used classification, developed by Alonso-Lej et al6 and modified by Todani et al,7 describes 5 broad types of choledochal cysts. The 2 relatively common categories of cyst are types I and IV-A. Type I, the most commonly reported overall, consists of dilatation of the common bile duct, which may be cystic, focal, or fusiform (subtypes A, B, and C, respectively). Type IV-A cysts are the second most common, defined as both intrahepatic and extrahepatic dilatation of the biliary tree. The remaining types are considerably rarer, with no large series published, and only sporadic reports appearing in the literature. Type II describes a saccular diverticulum off the common bile duct. Type III is represented by a cystic dilatation of the intramural portion of the common bile duct and is contended by some to represent a duodenal diverticulum rather than a choledochal cyst8 in view of the anatomical location and the duodenal epithelium with which they are always lined. The rare malformation of multiple extrahepatic cysts is designated type IV-B. Type V is synonymous with Caroli disease,9 describing multiple intrahepatic biliary dilatations.

Etiology

The most commonly propounded theory for the etiology of choledochal cysts relates to the observation that they are often associated with an anomalous pancreatobiliary junction10 with a long common channel (>15 mm). This is purported to allow pancreatic juice to reflux into the biliary system11 and to cause increased pressure within the common bile duct,12 which, in combination, may cause ductal dilatation. More recently, abnormal function of the sphincter of Oddi has been reported to predispose to pancreatic reflux into the biliary tree,13 and spasm of the sphincter of Oddi has been noted to be associated with choledochal cysts.14 Animal models demonstrating progressive dilatation of the common bile duct following anastomosis of the common bile duct to the pancreatic duct support this theory.15 However, the possibility that such challenging surgery may result in at least partial obstruction of the biliary system, and that in fact obstruction causes the dilatation rather than pancreatic juice reflux, cannot be entirely discounted. There is also some clinical evidence suggesting that anomalous pancreaticobiliary duct union is not responsible for choledochal cysts, at least not entirely.

First, anomalous pancreatobiliary union is detected in 57% to 96%11,12,1618 of cases of choledochal cyst, and therefore cannot account for the minority of cases with normal ductal entry into the ampulla of Vater. Second, it seems that choledochal cysts diagnosed antenatally do not have pancreatic juice reflux into the common bile duct,19 and that the concentration of biliary amylase rises with age at presentation, increasing the possibility that the reflux may occur in part as a result of choledochal cysts, but not necessarily as the cause. Another study20 of children with choledochal cysts found that 10 of 24 children had no activation of pancreatic enzymes in the common bile duct, and of these, 8 were younger than 2 months; therefore, pancreatic reflux is an unlikely candidate for the cause of these choledochal cysts.

A second possible cause of choledochal cysts has already been alluded to, in suggesting an alternative interpretation of the animal experiments anastomosing the common bile duct to the pancreatic duct as discussed previously.20 Obstruction of the common bile duct is another etiological theory for choledochal cysts and is also supported by other animal models. In neonatal animal models, ligation of the common bile duct causes a dilatation morphologically resembling a type I choledochal cyst; whereas in adults, generalized dilatation of the whole biliary system can be seen.21 Clinically, there is some evidence to support the theory that obstruction of the distal common bile duct may cause choledochal cysts. A case report of an antenatally diagnosed choledochal cyst found complete distal obstruction of the lower end of the common bile duct.22 Another case report found a congenital web at the lower end of the common bile duct in association with a type I choledochal cyst.8 The abnormal function of the sphincter of Oddi, reported in some studies to be associated with choledochal cysts, may represent a functional obstruction to the common bile duct, thus predisposing to choledochal cysts.14,23 This functional obstruction at the sphincter of Oddi also predisposes to pancreatic juice reflux into the biliary tree.24

These putative causes are not necessarily contradictory, as a distal common duct obstruction may coincide with an anomalous pancreaticobiliary union. It is conceivable that when such a coincidence occurs, both mechanisms act in tandem.

Some further observations have been made, which may be relevant to the etiology of choledochal cysts. One such observation is that the distal common bile duct has inadequate autonomic innervation.25,26 Kusunoki et al25 showed that there are abnormally few ganglion cells in the narrow portion if the common bile duct in patients with a choledochal cyst, as compared with controls. Presumably, this would result in a functional obstruction and proximal dilatation in the same manner as achalasia of the esophagus or Hirschprung disease.

Real-time polymerase chain reaction has been used to demonstrate high levels of reoviral RNA in biliary tissues from patients with choledochal cysts compared with controls.27 It is possible only to speculate as to how this may result in choledochal cysts. Perhaps viral infection of ganglion neurons causes the oligoganglionosis as discussed above, and perhaps viral infection triggers an immune response, which is subsequently responsible for fibrosis of the lower end of the biliary tract.

There are few reports of familial cases of choledochal cysts and associated anomalies. A pair of monozygotic twins were discordant for the occurrence of anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction and choledochal cyst, suggesting that there is not a strong genetic basis for these malformations.28 However, there may be some genetic predisposition, as there are reports of a mother and daughter29 and of dizygotic twins30 having choledochal cysts. Interestingly, in both reports, the cysts are of different Todani types; therefore, if there is a genetic basis for the predisposition in the families described, then it would seem to affect the biliary tree globally.

On balance, the weight of the evidence seems to support distal common bile duct obstruction (either anatomical or functional) and raised intraductal pressure as the most likely cause of choledochal cysts. The high incidence of anomalous pancreaticobiliary union cannot be ignored, but may just reflect an association with distal obstruction. Alternatively, pancreatic juice reflux into the common bile duct may be activated by bile,31 and activated enzymes subsequently weaken the common bile duct wall, exacerbating the dilatation.

Type IV-A cysts are more common in adults than in children,32 raising the possibility that although the lesions may be congenital, they may progress with time.

Presentation

The classical triad of jaundice, right upper quadrant mass, and abdominal pain is present in only a minority of patients (0%-17%).3,17,3335 It is more commonly seen in cases with onset in childhood rather than in adults, and 85% of children have at least 2 features of the triad at presentation, compared with only 25% of adults.36

Antenatal diagnoses can be made on ultrasound,37 although diagnostic accuracy from this technique has been reported to be as low as 15%,38 and it is not possible to differentiate between biliary atresia and choledochal cysts with antenatal ultrasound.39 Although 1 of 2 case reports suggests that serial antenatal ultrasound may permit the differential according to relative rates of enlargement of the duct diameter,40 further work to substantiate this supposition is required. However, neonates diagnosed antenatally are often asymptomatic at birth,41 so antenatal detection allows surgical intervention prior to the onset of complications from choledochal cysts.

Among the more commonly reported presenting features are cholangitis,34,42,43 pancreatitis,34,4345 and biliary peritonitis from cyst rupture.34,4648 Among adults, choledochal cysts are quite often incidental findings during investigation for other problems.34,4951

Rarer presentations include gastric outlet obstruction,42 neonatal bleeding tendency,52 duodenal intusussecption,53 and portal hypertension.54

The presentations of choledochal cysts are clearly protean, and prompt diagnosis relies on a high index of suspicion, aided by modern imaging techniques. Foremost among the differential diagnoses of dilatation of the common bile duct in children is biliary atresia.40,5557 In adults, the diagnosis is only sporadically in doubt preoperatively, owing to the quality of modern imaging. Stone impaction with proximal dilatation has been reported to mimic choledochal cysts.58 One adult thought to have a pancreatic pseudocyst was found to have a cholodochal cyst at operation59; this is easy to understand in view of the high incidence of pancreatitis caused by choledochal cysts. Another case report mistook primary sclerosing cholangitis for a cholodochal cyst.60

Investigation
Ultrasound Scanning

Ultrasound can diagnose choledochal cysts with a specificity of 97% in children,55 although this drops to 71% if the width criteria are reduced to increase sensitivity, with normal variants and secondary causes of biliary dilatation being misdiagnosed as choledochal cysts. Another study found that ultrasound successfully diagnosed 15 of 19 children younger 6 months with choledochal cysts.37 Ultrasound is therefore an excellent first-line investigation of neonatal jaundice persisting more than 2 weeks after birth,56 and may help to differentiate choledochal cysts from biliary atresia.57

Radionucleotide Scintigraphy

Scintigraphy is safe and atraumatic, and has been used for a long time in the diagnosis of choledochal cysts.59,61 Following the progression of an isotope from the biliary tract into the small intestine is reported to distinguish with 100% accuracy between choledochal cysts and biliary atresia.62 Type I cysts may be diagnosed with a sensitivity of 100%, but only two thirds of type IV disease is detected, and the extent of the intrahepatic disease may be underestimated on scintigraphy.63

Computed Tomographic Scan

Although there are reports of computed tomographic (CT) scans diagnosing choledochal cysts,64 others have found that cysts are missed on CT scans, and picked up on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).65 A comparative study of 14 patients with choledochal cysts was performed, in which each patient had both CT cholangiography and MRCP performed.66 The MRCP investigation was superior at detecting and defining lesions. A better role for CT scanning may be in the postoperative period, where it was shown to be superior to MRCP in locating the biliary-enteric anastomosis and in defining any stenosis thereof.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Investigation with ERCP is an excellent tool for defining biliary anatomy, and as such has been used to diagnose cholodochal cysts.6769 However, MRCP has been shown to be just as good as70,71 if not better than70 ERCP, without the potential complications of the latter, invasive technique.70

Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography

For the reasons outlined above, MRCP represents the current "gold standard" in the imaging of choledochal cysts. There are a few caveats to this. Although the technique is excellent for diagnosing and characterizing the cysts themselves, it is not so good at detecting anomalous pancreaticobiliary union.72,73 This is probably not all that important in determining patient management. Also, MRCP may not be as sensitive a tool in pediatric cases as it is in adults,71 where ultrasound has a preeminant role.

Complications
Pancreatitis

This is quite a common presentation of choledochal cysts, as described earlier. This may be due to the activation of pancreatic enzymes by bile reflux,31 in association with an anomalous pancreaticobiliary union. Certainly, the anomalous ductal union seems to predispose to pancreatitis, as in one study, 57% of patients with choledochal cysts had anomalous ductal union demonstrated by ERCP. All of these patients suffered pancreatitis. Only a third of patients with normal ducts had pancreatitis.16

Cholangitis

As with pancreatitis, cholangitis is a common complication of choledochal cysts and may be the presenting feature as mentioned earlier. It is also a commonly reported complication after surgical management.

Biliary Cirrhosis

This has been reported to be the presenting feature in 10% of children in one series,34 and in biopsies obtained during surgery, it has been found to occur in 40% to 50% of cases.37,74 In one series, liver changes, including bile duct proliferation, cholestasis, parenchymal damage, inflammatory cell infiltration, and pericentral fibrosis, were present in all livers on which biopsies were performed, irrespective of liver function and macroscopic liver appearance.74 In the same study, postoperative mortality from hepatic insufficiency occurred in 2 of 6 patients found to have biliary cirrhosis at surgery. All the studies cited earlier relate to infants and children, and emphasize the need for prompt treatment prior to the development of established cirrhosis.75

Malignancy

The prognosis for patients with cholangiocarcinoma arising in choledochal cysts is as grim as for cholangiocarcinoma in general, with median survival reported in the range of 6 to 21 months.7678 The incidence of malignancy in choledochocoeles is reported at between 10% and 30%.18,42,76,7880 Malignant change in association with choledochal cysts has been reported in pediatric cases,81 and it should therefore be suspected in any choledochal cyst appearing after infancy.

The pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma in choledochal cysts may be caused by the carcinogenic effect of pancreatic reflux.79 Supporting this contention is a study noting that the risk of cholangiocarcinoma in cysts is much higher in patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary union (32%) than in those without (0%).18 It seems that the presence of anomalous ductal union may be even more important than that of choledochal cyst, as one study found a 55% rate of biliary tract malignant neoplasia in patients with duct malunion, and only a 5% rate in patients without, whether (n = 14) or not (n = 4) choledochal cyst was present.82 The incidence of gallbladder carcinoma in patients with ductal malunion without choledochal cyst was 50% in another study, and only 5% in patients with malunion and choledochal cysts.83 In the patients without cysts, all the biliary malignancies were in the gallbladder, whereas in the patients with cysts, in addition to the 5% with gallbladder cancer, 14% had cholangiocarcinoma arising in the cyst.

It has been demonstrated that the histological changes in choledochal cysts progress with patient age at presentation, through epithelial denudement to inflammatory infiltrates, glandular metaplasia, and ultimately, malignancy.84

Putting these findings together, it is conceivable that pancreatic juice reflux secondary to anomalous ductal union is the predisposing factor for biliary tract malignancy, and that malignancy occurs in a region of biliary stasis, where the exposure to the refluxed pancreatic juice is prolonged. In the presence of a cyst of the common bile duct, this would be closer to the anomalous ductal union than the gallbladder, and therefore, more at risk of malignant change. In the absence of a choledochal cyst, the gallbladder is the only site of biliary stagnation.

There are some reports of malignant change in choledochal cysts by Todani classification that are relevant to management. Although it has been reported that type III cysts rarely undergo malignant change,85 there are reports of malignancy arising in choledochocoeles,86 and in a series of 11 patients with type III cysts, 3 contained cholangiocarcinoma at the time of diagnosis.79 In type IV-A disease, there are reports of malignancy arising in the intrahepatic dilated ducts, rather than in the common bile duct cysts.87,88 The management implications of these observations are discussed in the subsequent section.

Management
Excision vs Internal Drainage Procedures

Historically, a cholecystoenterostomy was considered a surgical management option for choledochal cysts. However, the most recent articles to advocate this approach were published in the 1970s.89,90 This approach has been abandoned in favor of cyst excision with hepaticoenterostomy, to reduce the complications of the former procedure. These include malignancy in the remaining cyst,91 pancreatitis,91 and cholangitis.34,92,93

When a patient has previously been treated by a cyst-enterotomy internal drainage procedure, 70% of patients require reoperation for the occurrence of complications, including cholangitis and hepatolithiasis.94 Indeed it has been recommended that patients who have previously undergone internal drainage procedures should undergo reoperation with cyst excision (even if asymptomatic) as prophylaxis against complications in particular cases of malignant cysts,95 even though the complications of surgery for excision after previous internal drainage procedure are more frequent than those seen after primary cyst excision.96

Timing of Surgery

The timing of surgery should be early after diagnosis to reduce the incidence of complications described,97 and particularly to prevent liver damage in neonates.75

Malignant Change After Cyst Excision

Even after cyst excision, there are reports of malignancy occurring, often relating to incomplete cyst excision. There is a series dissenting this, with a zero rate of postexcision malignancy in 37 patients, even though the excision was known to be incomplete in 28 cases.98 However, in a comprehensive review, the incidence of postexcision malignancy has been estimated at 0.7%.99

This may occur in the residual intrapancreatic portion of the choledochal cyst excision.99102 The recognition of this danger has driven the trend toward excision of the intrapancreatic portion of the common bile duct103 to the point of demonstrating the pancreaticobiliary duct union to ensure complete excision.104

The extent of the resection in type IV-A cysts is controversial. Several authors advocate management by excision of the extrahepatic component only, with hepaticoenterostomy.41,105107 However, malignancy has been reported to arise in the intrahepatic cysts as described above, and it has also been reported to occur after resection of the extrahepatic cyst with hepaticojejunostomy.108 Clearly, when the intrahepatic cysts are widespread, they cannot be excised; however, when the intrahepatic disease is localized, it would seem reasonable to perform the relevant partial hepatectomy. This approach has been practiced by other authors.32,76,109 For the same reason, partial hepatectomy has been practiced for Caroli disease.110

There is a report of cylindrical intrahepatic ductal dilatation in type IV-A disease regressing spontaneously after common duct excision and hepaticojejunostomy, compared with cystic intrahepatic disease, which does not regress.111 However, it seems likely that the cylindrical intrahepatic disease represents a type I cyst with an element of obstruction causing proximal dilatation, rather than a true type IV-A disease.

Choledochocoeles: An Exception to the Rule?

The malignant potential of type III cysts has been questioned in a review of 65 choledochocoeles,85 and for this reason they are often treated as the exception to the rule, by drainage into the duodenum at the ampulla, rather than by excision.41,64,92,105 The enourmous attraction of this approach is that it may be performed endoscopically by sphincterotomy.107,112115 However, as described above, malignancy does occur in type III cysts, and in one series in 3 of 11 patients.79 It is perhaps odd then that in the literature there are no advocates for the excision of choledochocoeles.

Reconstruction of Biliary Drainage

The most common reconstruction following cyst excision is a hepaticojejunostomy or choledochojejunostomy,35,37,41,92,105 with the former thought to reduce the incidence of stricture formation postoperatively.116 Alternatives that have been suggested include hepaticoduodenostomy so that the anastomosis is accessible to ERCP in the event of postoperative complications,117 and hepaticoantrostomy apparently for a more physiological result.118 Neither hepaticoduodenostomy nor hepaticoantrostomy have been widely adopted; the former perhaps because there are other ways of providing access to a biliary-enteric anastomosis without the relatively high risk of complications from a duodenal anastomosis. The latter may have had a variety of potential problems if the experience reported following a choledochal cystogastrostomy is anything to go by.119 The technique of appendix interposition hepaticoenterostomy similarly failed to gain widespread acclaim, as the appendix grafts underwent stenosis, and as a result, there was significant hepatic fibrosis secondary to obstruction.120

Postoperative Complications

Postoperative anastomotic strictures are a common problem121124 and are associated with intrahepatic cholelithiasis123125 and cholangitis.126 Intrahepatic stones are particularly a problem in cases of type IV-A disease with residual intrahepatic cysts.36

The incidence of anastomotic stricture formation may be reduced by performing a higher anastomosis, as Todani121 found that 9 of 22 choledochojejunostomies had postoperative anastomotic strictures, compared with 1 of 82 hepaticojejunostomies. Choledochoscopy at the time of surgery to detect and remove intrahepatic stones at operation reduces postoperative complications of cholelithiasis.127 Roux-en-Y limb stomas128 and Hutson129 access limbs have been used to facilitate endoscopic access to anastomotic strictures.

Laparoscopic Excision

Recently, laparoscopic cyst excision and hepaticojejunostomy have been described51,130132 It is too early to assess the long-term results of this approach in terms of anastomotic strictures and malignancy arising in residual cyst tissue.

Summary

Choledochal cysts are uncommon, but when encountered, they may appear nonspecifically rather than classically, and a high index of suspicion will avoid a delay in diagnosis. The imaging modality of choice for diagnosing and characterizing choledochal cysts is MRCP. Delayed diagnosis may have a variety of undesirable sequelae including biliary cirrhosis, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatitis, and cholangitis. To avoid these complications, choledochal cysts should be treated by complete excision wherever possible, with the possible exception of type III duodenal intramural cysts, which are often treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy. The approaches to intrahepatic disease and postoperative complications have also been discussed.

Corresponding author: Guy J. Maddern, University of Adelaide Department of Surgery, the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville Rd, Woodville, SA 5011 Australia (e-mail: guy.maddern@adelaide.edu.au).

Accepted for publication November 3, 2002.

References
1.
Schmidt  HGBauer  JWiessner  VSchonekas  H Endoscopic aspects of choledochoceles.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;43143- 146Google Scholar
2.
Moreno Gonzalez  EGarcia Garcia  I  et al.  Choledochal cyst resection and reconstruction by biliary-jejuno-duodenal diversion.  World J Surg. 1989;13232- 237Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Watanatittan  SNiramis  R Choledochal cyst: review of 74 pediatric cases.  J Med Assoc Thai. 1998;81586- 595Google Scholar
4.
Chen  HMJan  YYChen  MF  et al.  Surgical treatment of choledochal cyst in adults: results and long-term follow-up.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;431492- 1499Google Scholar
5.
Juttijudata  PChiemchaisri  CPalavatana  CChurnratanakul  S Causes of cholestasis in Thailand: a study of 276 consecutive patients.  Am J Surg. 1984;147360- 366Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Alonso-Lej  FRever  WBJPessagno  DJ Congenital choledochal cysts, with a report of 2, and an analysis of 94 cases.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1959;1081- 30Google Scholar
7.
Todani  TWatanabe  YNarusue  MTabuchi  KOkajima  K Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst.  Am J Surg. 1977;134263- 269Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Gorenstein  LStrasberg  SM Etiology of choledochal cysts: two instructive cases.  Can J Surg. 1985;28363- 367Google Scholar
9.
Caroli  JSoupalt  JKossakowski  LPlocker  LParadowska  M La digitation polykstique congenitale des voico biliares intrahepatiques; essai de classification.  Semin Hop Paris. 1958;34488- 495Google Scholar
10.
Babbitt  DP Congenital choledochal cysts: new etiological concepts on anomalous relationships of the common bile duct and pancreatic bulb.  Ann Radiol (Paris). 1969;12231- 240Google Scholar
11.
Zhao  LLi  ZMa  H  et al.  Congenital choledochal cyst with pancreatitis.  Chin Med J (Engl). 1999;112637- 640Google Scholar
12.
Iwai  NYanagihara  JTokiwa  KShimotake  TNakamura  K Congenital choledochal dilatation with emphasis on pathophysiology of the biliary tract.  Ann Surg. 1992;21527- 30Google ScholarCrossref
13.
Imazu  MIwai  NTokiwa  KShimotake  TKimura  OOno  S Factors of biliary carcinogenesis in choledochal cysts.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001;1124- 27Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Schweizer  PSchweizer  M Pancreaticobiliary long common channel syndrome and congenital anomalous dilatation of the choledochal duct: study of 46 patients.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1993;315- 21Google ScholarCrossref
15.
Ohkawa  HSawaguchi  SYamazaki  YIshikawa  AKikuchi  M Experimental analysis of the effect of anomalous pancreaticobilliary ductal union.  J Pediatr Surg. 1982;177- 13Google ScholarCrossref
16.
Swisher  SGCates  JAHunt  KK  et al.  Pancreatitis associated with adult choledochal cysts.  Pancreas. 1994;9633- 637Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Stringer  MDDhawan  ADavenport  MMieli-Vergani  GMowat  APHoward  ER Choledochal cysts: lessons from a 20 year experience.  Arch Dis Child. 1995;73528- 531Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Song  HKKim  MHMyung  SJ  et al.  Choledochal cyst associated the with anomalous union of pancreaticobiliary duct (AUPBD) has a more grave clinical course than choledochal cyst alone.  Korean J Intern Med. 1999;141- 8Google Scholar
19.
Davenport  MStringer  MDHoward  ER Biliary amylase and congenital choledochal dilatation.  J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30474- 477Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Yamashiro  YSato  MShimizu  TOguchi  SMiyano  T How great is the incidence of truly congenital common bile duct dilatation?  J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28622- 625Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Spitz  L Experimental production of cystic dilatation of the comon bile duct in lambs.  J Pediatr Surg. 1977;1239Google ScholarCrossref
22.
Tsang  TMTam  PKChamberlain  P Obliteration of the distal bile duct in the development of congenital choledochal cyst.  J Pediatr Surg. 1994;291582- 1583Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Ponce  JGarrigues  VSala  TPertejo  VBerenguer  J Endoscopic biliary manometry in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and in patients with cystic dilatation of the bile ducts.  Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34367- 371Google ScholarCrossref
24.
Iwai  NTokiwa  KTsuto  TYanagihara  JTakahashi  T Biliary manometry in choledochal cyst with abnormal choledochopancreatico ductal junction.  J Pediatr Surg. 1986;21873- 876Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Kusunoki  MSaitoh  NYamamura  TFujita  STakahashi  TUtsunomiya  J Choledochal cysts: oligoganglionosis in the narrow portion of the choledochus.  Arch Surg. 1988;123984- 986Google ScholarCrossref
26.
Shimotake  TIwai  NYanagihara  JInoue  KFushiki  S Innervation patterns in congenital biliary dilatation.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1995;5265- 270Google ScholarCrossref
27.
Tyler  KLSokol  RJOberhaus  SM  et al.  Detection of reovirus RNA in hepatobiliary tissues from patients with extrahepatic biliary atresia and choledochal cysts.  Hepatology. 1998;271475- 1482Google ScholarCrossref
28.
Uchida  MTsukahara  MFuji  TFujihara  TUeki  KKajii  T Discordance for anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction and congenital biliary dilatation in a set of monozygotic twins.  J Pediatr Surg. 1992;271563- 1564Google ScholarCrossref
29.
Iwata  FUchida  AMiyaki  T  et al.  Familial occurrence of congenital bile duct cysts.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;13316- 319Google ScholarCrossref
30.
Lane  GJYamataka  AKobayashi  HSegawa  OMiyano  T Different types of congenital biliary dilatation in dizygotic twins.  Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15403- 404Google ScholarCrossref
31.
Nakamura  TOkada  AHigaki  JTojo  HOkamoto  M Pancreaticobiliary maljunction-associated pancreatitis: an experimental study on the activation of pancreatic phospholipase A2.  World J Surg. 1996;20543- 550Google ScholarCrossref
32.
Todani  TNarusue  MWatanabe  YTabuchi  KOkajima  K Management of congenital choledochal cyst with intrahepatic involvement.  Ann Surg. 1978;187272- 280Google ScholarCrossref
33.
Sherman  PKolster  EDavies  CStringer  DWeber  J Choledochal cysts: heterogeneity of clinical presentation.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986;5867- 872Google ScholarCrossref
34.
Samuel  MSpitz  L Choledochal cyst: varied clinical presentations and long-term results of surgery.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1996;678- 81Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Rattan  KNKhurana  PBudhiraja  SMalik  VPandit  SK Choledochal cyst: a 10-year experience.  Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67657- 659Google ScholarCrossref
36.
Lipsett  PAPitt  HAColombani  PMBoitnott  JKCameron  JL Choledochal cyst disease: a changing pattern of presentation.  Ann Surg. 1994;220644- 652Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Cheng  MTChang  MHHsu  HY  et al.  Choledochal cyst in infancy: a follow-up study.  Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2000;4113- 17Google Scholar
38.
Redkar  RDavenport  MHoward  ER Antenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the biliary tract.  J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33700- 704Google ScholarCrossref
39.
Mackenzie  TCHowell  LJFlake  AWAdzick  NS The management of prenatally diagnosed choledochal cysts.  J Pediatr Surg. 2001;361241- 1243Google ScholarCrossref
40.
Matsubara  HOya  NSuzuki  Y  et al.  Is it possible to differentiate between choledochal cyst and congenital biliary atresia (type I cyst) by antenatal ultrasonography?  Fetal Diagn Ther. 1997;12306- 308Google ScholarCrossref
41.
Rha  SYStovroff  MCGlick  PLAllen  JERicketts  RR Choledochal cysts: a ten year experience.  Am Surg. 1996;6230- 34Google Scholar
42.
Jan  YYChen  HMChen  MF Malignancy in choledochal cysts.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49100- 103Google Scholar
43.
Karanikas  IDKoundourakis  SSMacheras  ANPanagiotidis  HCLiakakos  TDDendrinos  SS Long-term results of management of type I choledochal cysts in adults.  Acta Chir Belg. 1997;9713- 18Google Scholar
44.
Lin  JTHChen  YHNi  YHLai  HSPeng  SS Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography diagnosed pancreatitis associated choledochal cyst: report of one case.  Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2001;42363- 366Google Scholar
45.
Weisser  MBennek  JHormann  D Choledochocele: a rare cause of necrotising pancreatitis in childhood.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2000;10258- 264Google ScholarCrossref
46.
Seema  Not AvailableSharma  ASeth  ATaluja  VBagga  DAneja  S Spontaneous rupture of choledochal cyst.  Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67155- 156Google ScholarCrossref
47.
Lin  SLShan  KMHung  YBNg  SHLin  CY Choledochal cyst associated with acute acalculous cholecystitis.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;31307- 308Google ScholarCrossref
48.
Ando  KMiyano  TKohno  STakamizawa  SLane  G Spontaneous perforation of choledochal cyst: a study of 13 cases.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1998;823- 25Google ScholarCrossref
49.
Sato  MIshida  HKonno  K  et al.  Choledochal cyst due to anomalous pancreatobiliary junction in the adult: sonographic findings.  Abdom Imaging. 2001;26395- 400Google ScholarCrossref
50.
Kim  JELee  JKLee  KT  et al.  The clinical significance of common bile-duct dilatation in patients without biliary symptoms or causative lesions on ultrasonography.  Endoscopy. 2001;33495- 500Google ScholarCrossref
51.
Liu  DCRodriguez  JAMeric  FGeiger  JL Laparoscopic excision of a rare type II choledochal cyst: case report and review of the literature.  J Pediatr Surg. 2000;351117- 1119Google ScholarCrossref
52.
Ono  STokiwa  KAoi  SIwai  NNakanoin  H A bleeding tendency as the first symptom of a choledochal cyst.  Pediatr Surg Int. 2000;16111- 112Google ScholarCrossref
53.
Ramos  ACastello  JPinto  I Intestinal intussusception as a presenting feature of choledochocele.  Gastrointest Radiol. 1990;15211- 214Google ScholarCrossref
54.
Martin  LWRowe  GA Portal hypertension secondary to choledochal cyst.  Ann Surg. 1979;190638- 639Google ScholarCrossref
55.
Lee  HCYeung  CYChang  PYSheu  JCWang  NL Dilatation of the biliary tree in children: sonographic diagnosis and its clinical significance.  J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19177- 184Google Scholar
56.
Gubernick  JARosenberg  HKIlaslan  HKessler  A US approach to jaundice in infants and children.  Radiographics. 2000;20173- 195Google ScholarCrossref
57.
Kim  WSKim  IOYeon  KMPark  KWSeo  JKKim  CJ Choledochal cyst with or without biliary atresia in neonates and young infants: US differentiation.  Radiology. 1998;209465- 469Google Scholar
58.
Aggarwal  SKumar  ARoy  SBandhu  S Massive dilatation of the common bile duct resembling a choledochal cyst.  Trop Gastroenterol. 2001;22219- 220Google Scholar
59.
Rosenfield  NGriscom  NT Choledochal cysts: roentgenographic techniques.  Radiology. 1975;114113- 119Google Scholar
60.
Postema  RRHazebroek  FW Choledochal cysts in children: a review of 28 years of treatment in a Dutch children's hospital.  Eur J Surg. 1999;1651159- 1161Google ScholarCrossref
61.
Oshiumi  YNakayama  CMorita  KNumaguchi  YKoga  IMatsuura  K Serial scintigraphy of choledochal cysts using 131I-rose bengal and 131I-bromsulphalein.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1977;128769- 771Google ScholarCrossref
62.
Johnson  KAlton  HMChapman  S Evaluation of mebrofenin hepatoscintigraphy in neonatal-onset jaundice.  Pediatr Radiol. 1998;28937- 941Google ScholarCrossref
63.
Rajnish  AGambhir  SDas  BKSaxena  R Classifying choledochal cysts using hepatobiliary scintigraphy.  Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25996- 999Google ScholarCrossref
64.
Groebli  YMeyer  JLTschantz  P Choledochocele demonstrated by computed tomographic cholangiography: report of a case.  Surg Today. 2000;30272- 276Google ScholarCrossref
65.
De Backer  AIVan den Abbeele  KDe Schepper  AMVan Baarle  A Choledochocele: diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging.  Abdom Imaging. 2000;25508- 510Google ScholarCrossref
66.
Lam  WWLam  TPSaing  HChan  FLChan  KL MR cholangiography and CT cholangiography of pediatric patients with choledochal cysts.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173401- 405Google ScholarCrossref
67.
Park  KBAuh  YHKim  JH  et al.  Diagnostic pitfalls in the cholangiographic diagnosis of choledochoceles: cholangiographic quality and its effect on visualization.  Abdom Imaging. 2001;2648- 54Google ScholarCrossref
68.
Kabra  VAgarwal  MAdukai  TKDixit  VKAgrawal  AKShukla  VK Choledochal cyst: a changing pattern of presentation.  ANZ J Surg. 2001;71159- 161Google ScholarCrossref
69.
Kim  MHMyung  SJLee  SK  et al.  Ballooning of the papilla during contrast injection: the semaphore of a choledochocele.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48258- 262Google ScholarCrossref
70.
Kim  SHLim  JHYoon  HKHan  BKLee  SKKim  YI Choledochal cyst: comparison of MR and conventional cholangiography.  Clin Radiol. 2000;55378- 383Google ScholarCrossref
71.
Irie  HHonda  HJimi  M  et al.  Value of MR cholangiopancreatography in evaluating choledochal cysts.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;1711381- 1385Google ScholarCrossref
72.
Govil  SJustus  AKorah  IPerakath  AZachariah  NSen  S Choledochal cysts: evaluation with MR cholangiography.  Abdom Imaging. 1998;23616- 619Google ScholarCrossref
73.
Miyazaki  TYamashita  YTang  YTsuchigame  TTakahashi  MSera  Y Single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography of neonates, infants, and young children.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;17033- 37Google ScholarCrossref
74.
Nambirajan  LTaneja  PSingh  MKMitra  DKBhatnagar  V The liver in choledochal cyst.  Trop Gastroenterol. 2000;21135- 139Google Scholar
75.
Suita  SShono  KKinugasa  YKubota  MMatsuo  S Influence of age on the presentation and outcome of choledochal cyst.  J Pediatr Surg. 1999;341765- 1768Google ScholarCrossref
76.
Liu  CLFan  STLo  CMLam  CMPoon  RTWong  J Choledochal cysts in adults.  Arch Surg. 2002;137465- 468Google ScholarCrossref
77.
Jan  YYChen  HMChen  MF Malignancy in choledochal cysts.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47337- 340Google Scholar
78.
Stain  SCGuthrie  CRYellin  AEDonovan  AJ Choledochal cyst in the adult.  Ann Surg. 1995;222128- 133Google ScholarCrossref
79.
Ohtsuka  TInoue  KOhuchida  J  et al.  Carcinoma arising in choledochocele.  Endoscopy. 2001;33614- 619Google ScholarCrossref
80.
Tsuchiya  RHarada  NIto  TFurukawa  MYoshihiro  I Malignant tumors in choledochal cysts.  Ann Surg. 1977;18622- 28Google ScholarCrossref
81.
Iwai  NDeguchi  EYanagihara  J  et al.  Cancer arising in a choledochal cyst in a 12-year-old girl.  J Pediatr Surg. 1990;251261- 1263Google ScholarCrossref
82.
Kato  OHattori  KSuzuki  TTachino  FYuasa  T Clinical significance of anomalous pancreaticobiliary union.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1983;2994- 98Google ScholarCrossref
83.
Chijiiwa  KKimura  HTanaka  M Malignant potential of the gallbladder in patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction: the difference in risk between patients with and without choledochal cyst.  Int Surg. 1995;8061- 64Google Scholar
84.
Komi  NTamura  TTsuge  SMiyoshi  YUdaka  HTakehara  H Relation of patient age to premalignant alterations in choledochal cyst epithelium: histochemical and immunohistochemical studies.  J Pediatr Surg. 1986;21430- 433Google ScholarCrossref
85.
Tajiri  H Choledochocele-containing stones.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;911046- 1048Google Scholar
86.
Pisano  GDonlon  JBPlatell  CHall  JC Cholangiocarcinoma in a type III choledochal cyst.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1991;61855- 857Google ScholarCrossref
87.
Kawamoto  SHiraoka  TMaruta  SWatanabe  EKanemitsu  KTsuji  T A case of early cancer in cystic intrahepatic duct associated with congenital choledochal cyst.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45428- 432Google Scholar
88.
Tajiri  KTakenawa  HYamaoka  KYamane  MMarumo  FSato  C Choledochal cyst with adenocarcinoma in the cystically dilated intrahepatic bile duct.  Abdom Imaging. 1997;22190- 193Google ScholarCrossref
89.
Spitz  L Choledochal cyst.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;147444- 452Google Scholar
90.
Muakkasah  KObeid  SSlim  M Congenital choledochal cysts.  Arch Surg. 1976;1111112- 1114Google ScholarCrossref
91.
Nagorney  DMMcIlrath  DCAdson  MA Choledochal cysts in adults: clinical management.  Surgery. 1984;96656- 663Google Scholar
92.
Kouraklis  GMisiakos  EGlinavou  AKaratzas  GGogas  JSkalkeas  G Cystic dilatations of the common bile duct in adults.  HPB Surg. 1996;1091- 95Google ScholarCrossref
93.
Takiff  HStone  MFonkalsrud  EW Choledochal cysts: results of primary surgery and need for reoperation in young patients.  Am J Surg. 1985;150141- 146Google ScholarCrossref
94.
Chijiiwa  KKoga  A Surgical management and long-term follow-up of patients with choledochal cysts.  Am J Surg. 1993;165238- 242Google ScholarCrossref
95.
Chaudhary  ADhar  PSachdev  A Reoperative surgery for choledochal cysts.  Br J Surg. 1997;84781- 784Google ScholarCrossref
96.
Kaneko  KAndo  HWatanabe  Y  et al.  Secondary excision of choledochal cysts after previous cyst-enterostomies.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;462772- 2775Google Scholar
97.
Lai  HSDuh  YCChen  WJ  et al.  Manifestations and surgical treatment of choledochal cyst in different age group patients.  J Formos Med Assoc. 1997;96242- 246Google Scholar
98.
Ishibashi  TKasahara  KYasuda  YNagai  HMakino  SKanazawa  K Malignant change in the biliary tract after excision of choledochal cyst.  Br J Surg. 1997;841687- 1691Google ScholarCrossref
99.
Watanabe  YToki  ATodani  T Bile duct cancer developed after cyst excision for choledochal cyst.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6207- 212Google ScholarCrossref
100.
Eriguchi  NAoyagi  SOkuda  K  et al.  Carcinoma arising in the pancreas 17 years after primary excision of a choledochal cysts: report of a case.  Surg Today. 2001;31534- 537Google ScholarCrossref
101.
Kurokawa  YHasuike  YTsujinaka  T  et al.  Carcinoma of the head of the pancreas after excision of a choledochal cyst.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48578- 580Google Scholar
102.
Fujisaki  SAkiyama  TMiyake  H  et al.  A case of carcinoma associated with the remained intrapancreatic biliary tract 17 years after the primary excision of a choledochal cyst.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;461655- 1659Google Scholar
103.
Ando  HKaneko  KIto  T  et al.  Complete excision of the intrapancreatic portion of choledochal cysts.  J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183317- 321Google Scholar
104.
Jesudason  SRGovil  SMathai  VKuruvilla  RMuthusami  JC Choledochal cysts in adults.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79410- 413Google Scholar
105.
Lopez  RRPinson  CWCampbell  JRHarrison  MKaton  RM Variation in management based on type of choledochal cyst.  Am J Surg. 1991;161612- 615Google ScholarCrossref
106.
Hewitt  PMKrige  JEBornman  PCTerblanche  J Choledochal cysts in adults.  Br J Surg. 1995;82382- 385Google ScholarCrossref
107.
Belli  GRotondano  GD'Agostino  AIannelli  AMarano  ISantangelo  ML Cystic dilation of extrahepatic bile ducts in adulthood: diagnosis, surgical treatment and long-term results.  HPB Surg. 1998;10379- 385Google ScholarCrossref
108.
Kobayashi  SAsano  TYamasaki  MKenmochi  TNakagohri  TOchiai  T Risk of bile duct carcinogenesis after excision of extrahepatic bile ducts in pancreaticobiliary maljunction.  Surgery. 1999;126939- 944Google ScholarCrossref
109.
Nakayama  HMasuda  HUgajin  WKoshinaga  TFukuzawa  M Left hepatic lobectomy for type IV-A choledochal cyst.  Am Surg. 2000;661020- 1022Google Scholar
110.
Shito  MShintoku  JMiyazaki  HMukai  M Asymptomatic intrahepatic choledochal cyst associated with chronic active hepatitis C.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;452356- 2358Google Scholar
111.
Thambi Dorai  CRVisvanathan  RMcAll  GL Type IVa choledochal cysts: surgical management and literature review.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1991;61505- 510Google ScholarCrossref
112.
Elton  EHanson  BLBiber  BPHowell  DA Dilated common channel syndrome: endoscopic diagnosis, treatment, and relationship to choledochocele formation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47471- 478Google ScholarCrossref
113.
Adamek  HESchilling  DWeitz  MRiemann  JF Choledochocele imaged with magnetic resonance cholangiography.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;951082- 1083Google ScholarCrossref
114.
Siegel  EGFolsch  UR Primary sclerosing cholangitis mimicking choledocal cyst type 1 in a young patient.  Endoscopy. 1999;31200- 203Google ScholarCrossref
115.
Samavedy  RSherman  SLehman  GA Endoscopic therapy in anomalous pancreatobiliary duct junction.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50623- 627Google ScholarCrossref
116.
Todani  TWatanabe  YUrushihara  NNoda  TMorotomi  Y Biliary complications after excisional procedure for choledochal cyst.  J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30478- 481Google ScholarCrossref
117.
Henne-Bruns  DKremer  BThonke  FGrimm  HSoehendra  N "Endoscopy friendly" resection technique of choledochal cysts.  Endoscopy. 1993;25176- 178Google ScholarCrossref
118.
Schimpl  GAigner  RSorantin  EMayr  JSauer  H Comparison of hepaticoantrostomy and hepaticojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction after resection of a choledochal cyst.  Pediatr Surg Int. 1997;12271- 275Google ScholarCrossref
119.
Malt  RA Obstructing phytobezoar of an intrahepatic bile duct.  Arch Surg. 1979;11486- 87Google ScholarCrossref
120.
Delarue  AChappuis  JPEsposito  C  et al.  Is the appendix graft suitable for routine biliary surgery in children?  J Pediatr Surg. 2000;351312- 1316Google ScholarCrossref
121.
Todani  TWatanabe  YToki  AOgura  KWang  ZQ Co-existing biliary anomalies and anatomical variants in choledochal cyst.  Br J Surg. 1998;85760- 763Google ScholarCrossref
122.
Hamada  YSato  MTakada  KHioki  K Spiral computed tomography for bilioenteric anastomotic stricture.  Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;13424- 425Google ScholarCrossref
123.
Uno  KTsuchida  YKawarasaki  HOhmiya  HHonna  T Development of intrahepatic cholelithiasis long after primary excision of choledochal cysts.  J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183583- 588Google Scholar
124.
Ando  HIto  TKaneko  KSeo  TIto  F Intrahepatic bile duct stenosis causing intrahepatic calculi formation following excision of a choledochal cyst.  J Am Coll Surg. 1996;18356- 60Google Scholar
125.
Hsu  RKYu  ALee  JGLeung  JW Pancreatitis caused by common bile duct stones in a 3-year-old boy with prior surgery for a choledochal cyst.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;961919- 1921Google ScholarCrossref
126.
Tsuchida  YTakahashi  ASuzuki  N  et al.  Development of intrahepatic biliary stones after excision of choledochal cysts.  J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37165- 167Google ScholarCrossref
127.
Yamataka  AOhshiro  KOkada  Y  et al.  Complications after cyst excision with hepaticoenterostomy for choledochal cysts and their surgical management in children versus adults.  J Pediatr Surg. 1997;321097- 1102Google ScholarCrossref
128.
Saing  HChan  KLMya  GHCheng  WFan  STChan  FL Cutaneous stoma in the roux limb of hepaticojejunostomy (hepaticocutaneous jejunostomy): useful access for intrahepatic stone extraction.  J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31247- 250Google ScholarCrossref
129.
Scudamore  CHHemming  AWTeare  JPFache  JSErb  SRWatkinson  AF Surgical management of choledochal cysts.  Am J Surg. 1994;167497- 500Google ScholarCrossref
130.
Tanaka  MShimizu  SMizumoto  K  et al.  Laparoscopically assisted resection of choledochal cyst and Roux-en-Y reconstruction.  Surg Endosc. 2001;15545- 552Google ScholarCrossref
131.
Watanabe  YSato  MTokui  KKoga  SYukumi  SKawachi  K Laparoscope-assisted minimally invasive treatment for choledochal cyst.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9415- 418Google ScholarCrossref
132.
Shimura  HTanaka  MShimizu  SMizumoto  K Laparoscopic treatment of congenital choledochal cyst.  Surg Endosc. 1998;121268- 1271Google ScholarCrossref
×