Improved Outcome After Extended Gastric Myotomy for Achalasia | Gastroenterology | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Csendes  ABraghetto  IHenriquez  ACortes  C Late results of a prospective randomised study comparing forceful dilatation and oesophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia.  Gut. 1989;30299- 304Google ScholarCrossref
Ellis Jr  FHGibb  SPCrozier  RE Esophagomyotomy for achalasia of the esophagus.  Ann Surg. 1980;192157- 161Google ScholarCrossref
Patti  MGPellegrini  CAHorgan  S  et al.  Minimally invasive surgery for achalasia: an 8-year experience with 168 patients.  Ann Surg. 1999;230587- 593Google ScholarCrossref
Horgan  SPellegrini  CA Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.  Surg Clin North Am. 1997;771063- 1082Google ScholarCrossref
Ali  APellegrini  CA Laparoscopic myotomy: technique and efficacy in treating achalasia.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2001;11347- 358Google Scholar
Hunter  JGTrus  TLBranum  GDWaring  JP Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and fundoplication for achalasia.  Ann Surg. 1997;225655- 665Google ScholarCrossref
Raiser  FPerdikis  GHinder  RA  et al.  Heller myotomy via minimal-access surgery: an evaluation of antireflux procedures.  Arch Surg. 1996;131593- 598Google ScholarCrossref
Sharp  KWKhaitan  LScholz  SHolzman  MDRichards  WO 100 consecutive minimally invasive Heller myotomies: lessons learned.  Ann Surg. 2002;235631- 639Google ScholarCrossref
Pellegrini  CWetter  LAPatti  M  et al.  Thoracoscopic esophagomyotomy: initial experience with a new approach for the treatment of achalasia.  Ann Surg. 1992;216291- 299Google ScholarCrossref
Zaninotto  GConstantini  MPortale  G  et al.  Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of failures after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia.  Ann Surg. 2002;235186- 192Google ScholarCrossref
Spiess  AEKahrilas  PJ Treating achalasia: from whalebone to laparoscope.  JAMA. 1998;280638- 642Google ScholarCrossref
Bonavina  LNosadini  ABardini  RBaessato  MPeracchia  A Primary treatment of esophageal achalasia: long-term results of myotomy and Dor fundoplication.  Arch Surg. 1992;127222- 226Google ScholarCrossref
Richards  WOClements  RHWang  PC  et al.  Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux after laparoscopic Heller myotomy.  Surg Endosc. 1999;131010- 1014Google ScholarCrossref
Del Genio  ADi Martino  NMaffettone  VIzzo  GZampiello  PMugione  P Failure of surgical treatment for achalasia: diagnosis and treatment [in Italian].  Ann Ital Chir. 1995;66587- 595Google Scholar
Wills  VLHunt  DR Functional outcome after Heller myotomy and fundoplication for achalasia.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2001;5408- 413Google ScholarCrossref
May 2003

Improved Outcome After Extended Gastric Myotomy for Achalasia

Author Affiliations

From the Swallowing Center and Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.

Arch Surg. 2003;138(5):490-497. doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.5.490

Hypothesis  There is general agreement that a Heller myotomy should extend 6 to 7 cm above the gastroesophageal junction. Results of most previous studies have recommended that the myotomy extend 1 to 1.5 cm below the gastroesophageal junction. We speculated that the effectiveness of the operation could be improved if a longer, 3-cm myotomy was carried out below the gastroesophageal junction, as it would more completely obliterate the lower esophageal sphincter. We, therefore, changed our technique in 1998. Concurrently, we converted from a Dor fundoplication to a Toupet fundoplication. This study analyzes the results of our new strategy.

Design  A case series using a prospectively maintained database.

Setting  Tertiary referral center.

Patients  One hundred ten consecutive patients with achalasia undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

Intervention  We analyzed the course of 52 patients treated with a standard laparoscopic esophagogastric myotomy (1.5 cm in the stomach) and a Dor fundoplication between September 1, 1994, and August 31, 1998, and 58 treated with an extended gastric myotomy (3 cm below the gastroesophageal junction) and a Toupet fundoplication between September 1, 1998, and August 31, 2001.

Main Outcome Measures  Esophageal function testing (esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring), symptom questionnaire (frequency and severity), and postoperative interventions required.

Results  Postoperatively the lower esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly lower after extended gastric myotomy and a Toupet fundoplication vs standard myotomy and a Dor fundoplication (9.5 vs 15.8 mm Hg). Dysphagia was both less frequent (1.2 vs 2.1) and less severe (visual analog scale, 3.2 vs 5.3) after extended gastric myotomy and Toupet fundoplication. In the standard laparoscopic esophagogastric myotomy and a Dor fundoplication group, 9 patients (17%) had recurrent, severe dysphagia, which was treated by dilation in 5 patients and by reoperation in 4 patients. In the extended gastric myotomy and Toupet fundoplication group, 2 patients (3%) developed recurrent dysphagia that resolved with dilatation. There were no reoperations in the extended gastric myotomy and Toupet fundoplication group. No difference was noted in the frequency of heartburn (1.3 vs 1.7), regurgitation (0.3 vs 0.8), and chest pain (0.3 vs 0.6), nor was there a difference between the 2 groups in proximal (1.7% vs 2.3%) and distal (6.0% vs 5.9%) esophageal acid exposure.

Conclusion  An extended gastric myotomy (3 cm) more effectively disrupts the lower esophageal sphincter, thus improving the results of surgical therapy for achalasia for dysphagia without increasing the rate of abnormal gastroesophageal reflux provided that a Toupet fundoplication is added.