Hypothesis
Adequate locoregional surgical treatment prevents local relapse of abdominal neuroblastoma.
Design
A retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients who underwent surgical excision for abdominal neuroblastoma.
Setting
University hospital.
Patients
Forty-seven patients with abdominal neuroblastomas whose primary tumor site was restricted to the adrenal gland or the adjoining sympathetic ganglia.
Intervention
Complete excision of the primary tumor and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.
Main Outcome Measures
Surgical intervention, postoperative complications, survival, and local recurrence.
Results
The average duration of surgery was 5 hours 28 minutes; the mean intraoperative blood loss was 27.7 g/kg of body weight. We had no intraoperative major complications leading to visceral insufficiency or perioperative deaths. The following 15 postoperative complications were observed in 12 patients; these complications included diarrhea (8 patients), renal atrophy (3 patients), intestinal obstruction (2 patients), chylous ascites (1 patient), and wound infection (1 patient). The mean follow-up period for the entire patient population was 8.5 years. All 30 patients with Evans stage I, II, III, or IV-S and 8 of the 17 patients with Evans stage IV were alive without evidence of disease. Eight patients died of progressive disease; 1 died of cytomegalovirus infection. No local recurrence was detected within the lymphadenectomy field in any of the patients.
Conclusion
Complete excision of the primary tumor and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy can be done safely and provides excellent locoregional control for patients with abdominal neuroblastoma.
NEUROBLASTOMA (NB) is one of the most common childhood cancers. Patients with advanced stages of this tumor have a low cure rate despite aggressive treatment including intensive chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation. In addition to various prognostic factors identified in the past, recent molecular biology–based studies have demonstrated that the poor prognosis is correlated with N-myc amplification,1 euploid tumor DNA,2 deletion of chromosome 1p,3 and absence of TrkA expression.4 These biological analyses, which are ongoing, suggest that (1) NB is a heterogeneous disease and (2) therapeutic strategies should be altered to fit individual cases. However, the actual management of patients who have NB remains a therapeutic challenge. An NB is usually treated with a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy.
The contribution of surgical treatment is clear in patients with localized disease, and complete excision provides a significant survival advantage for patients with localized NB.5-9 Although total tumor removal in cancer surgery includes organ-specific regional nodal dissection, rationalization of lymph node dissection for regionality has not been established as the standard surgical treatment of abdominal NB. The reasons are that the lymphatics of the retroperitoneum are complex and the anatomical localization of nodal involvement has not been well understood.
We studied the lymphatic drainage of adrenal NBs using intraoperative vital staining and histologically confirmed that this tumor involves retroperitoneal lymph nodes bilaterally.10 Accordingly, we performed lymphadenectomy with consideration of the retroperitoneal lymphatics in the surgical treatment of abdominal NB. This study assessed the results of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for abdominal NB and clarifies its effectiveness in the management of abdominal NB.
Forty-seven consecutive patients (14 girls and 33 boys) with abdominal NB who underwent surgical excision at Children's Research Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan, from September 1986 to December 1998 were eligible for this study. Twenty-eight patients were younger than 1 year; the remaining 19 were older than 1 year. The primary site of the NB was restricted to the adrenal gland (29 patients) or the adjoining sympathetic ganglia (18 patients). According to the staging system of Evans et al,11 14 patients had stage I NB (ie, limited to the organ of origin), 6 had stage II (ie, homolateral lymph node involvement, tumor cannot invade across the midline), 6 had stage III (ie, tumor extends across the midline, local lymph node can be involved bilaterally), 17 had stage IV (ie, distant metastasis, including the skeleton, soft tissue, and/or distant lymph nodes), and 4 had stage IV-S (ie, primary stage I/II lesion, with remote disease confined to the liver, skin, subcutaneous tissue, or bone marrow). Primary resection was performed in 26 patients; delayed primary or second-look resection was performed in 21 patients. Nodal involvement was confirmed histologically in 28 patients including all 6 patients who had Evans stage II NB, 4 who had stage III, 16 who had stage IV, and 2 who had stage IV-S. A combination of vincristine sulfate, doxorubicin hydrochloride, cyclophosphamide, and cisplatin was most commonly used in those patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. Similar postoperative chemotherapy was also administered to patients with advanced cases of NB. However, no patient received either preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy to the primary tumor site. In patients who had Evans stage IV disease, the delayed primary or second-look operation was planned after iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy was performed to determine that distant metastasis was negative and major vessel involvement was considered negative or minimal.
Our previous study10 revealed the topography of lymphatic drainage from adrenal NB to be as follows: primary lymphatic drainage is to the nodes at the origin of the renal artery, those around the hemiazygos vein for a left adrenal NB, and those around the azygos vein for a right adrenal NB. The secondary regional nodes are the interaorticovenous nodes, the para-aortic nodes for a left adrenal NB, and the paracaval nodes for a right adrenal NB. Therefore, in the surgical treatment of patients included in this study, we dissected lymph nodes at the origin of the right renal artery, in addition to nodes around the azygos vein, the interaorticovenous nodes, and the paracaval nodes in patients who had a right-sided retroperitoneal NB (Figure 1A). In patients with a left-sided retroperitoneal NB, lymph nodes at the origin of the left renal artery, those around the hemiazygos vein, the interaorticovenous nodes, and the para-aortic nodes were dissected (Figure 1B).
We skeletonized some parts of the abdominal aorta and vena cava. However, bilateral kidney and mesenteric vessels were preserved in all operations; testicular or ovarian vessels and hypogastric plexus were also preserved as much as possible. In this series of surgical procedures, we performed the same pattern of lymphadenectomy in those patients who had a tumor originating from a sympathetic ganglion adjoining the adrenal gland, in addition to adrenal NB, because most of these sympathetic tumors were fed by the inferior or middle adrenal arteries and had similar lymphatic drainage to that from the adrenal NB.
One of us (K.T.), who designed the previous study on the lymphatics of NB, participated in all of the operations performed during this study. All operations were performed under this surgeon's guidance in accord with the procedures described earlier.10 Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all patients.
The medical records of all patients, including operative and the postmortem examination reports, were reviewed, and clinically relevant data on surgical intervention, postoperative complications, survival, and local recurrence were analyzed. Local recurrence was defined as recurrence after complete tumor control in the primary site and was determined by periodic imaging studies using computed tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, and/or scintigraphy using metaiodobenzylguanidine tagged with iodohippurate sodium 123, or autopsy in cases of death. Plots of survival time were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method12 and survival curves were compared using the log rank test. The t and Mann-Whitney tests were also used to compare groups. P<.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are given as mean (SD).
The average duration of surgery was 5 hours 28 minutes (range, 2 hours 30 minutes to 13 hours 50 minutes) (Table 1). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 27.7 (34.5) g/kg of body weight (range, 1.9-155.9 g/kg of body weight), and intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in patients who had early stages of NB than those with advanced stages of NB (P<.01). The mean transfusion requirement in the 28 patients who received an intraoperative blood transfusion was 15.4 (24.0) mL/kg of body weight (range, 3-129 mL/kg of body weight). There was no necessity for blood transfusion in 19 patients, including 11 of the 14 patients who had Evans stage I disease and 3 of the 6 patients who had Evans stage II disease. In addition, there were no intraoperative major complications leading to visceral insufficiency or perioperative death. Postoperative chemotherapy was administered within 2 weeks after surgery in advanced cases of NB. The preoperative therapeutic schema was not changed by the results of surgery in any of the patients.
Postoperative complications
Postoperative complications were observed in 12 patients (Table 2). Diarrhea was the most common problem and was noted in 8 patients. This postoperative diarrhea resolved within a few weeks in most patients, with the exception of 1 patient who had prolonged diarrhea lasting 6 months after surgery. Chylous ascites was found in 1 patient who was treated with conservative therapy and was cured within 2 weeks. Intestinal obstruction was noted in 2 patients, who underwent laparotomy for postoperative intussusception and adhesion. Renal atrophy was observed in 3 patients who had Evans stages II, III, and IV disease. The atrophic kidney was on the same side as the tumor in all cases. Postoperative ejaculatory function could not be assessed in all patients because most patients had not reached the reproductive age.
Survival and local recurrence
The mean follow-up period for the entire patient population was 8.5 years (range, 0.7-15.8 years), and for survivors it was 10.1 years (range, 3.5-15.8 years). All 30 patients with Evans stage I, II, III, or IV-S disease; 8 of the 17 patients with stage IV disease were alive without evidence of disease (Figure 2). Survival rate of patients with stage IV disease was 47.1%; there were statistically significant differences in the survival rates between patients with Evans stage I, II, III, or IV-S disease and those with stage IV disease (P = .001). Eight patients, including 6 of the 7 patients with N-myc amplification, who all had Evans stage IV disease, died of progressive disease. The remaining 1 patient died of cytomegalovirus infection. There was no local recurrence detected within the lymphadenectomy field in any subjects, including those who died.
Surgical management is beneficial in patients with cancer who have localized disease. It is generally accepted that complete tumor resection of an NB has offered the best chance of a cure in patients with Evans stages I and II NBs.5 Several clinical studies have also demonstrated a better survival rate with complete excision of stage III NB.7-9 Additional reports have stated that complete resection along with intensive chemotherapy is associated with improved survival even in patients with Evans stage IV NB.13 However, the definition of total removal has been obscure in the past literature, suggesting that the true effectiveness of surgery in the treatment of NB remains unknown.
On the other hand, findings from a 1995 and a 1998 study14,15 have demonstrated that in many malignancies nodal involvement can only be proved by means of molecular analysis. We similarly believe that micrometastasis of regional lymph nodes is best confirmed by molecular biology analysis in patients with NB, and concur that the histologic validation of resected specimens does not always correlate with complete excision. Therefore, we have delineated a definite area for lymph node dissection in accord with the laterality of the tumor origin and have performed definitive surgery for abdominal NB based on the retroperitoneal lymphatics of NB as determined in a previous study.10 In the present study, we used the clinical staging system of Evans et al11 and assessed primarily the efficacy of the surgical contribution among the many factors potentially influencing the clinical outcome in patients with abdominal NB.
The most important focus of this study was local recurrence after surgical resection of the NB. Despite intensive treatment, NB often recurs in the area of the primary tumor.16-18 Ikeda et al16 examined the effect of local treatment in 29 patients with advanced NB who were treated with supralethal chemotherapy and total-body irradiation followed by bone marrow transplantation. They reported that the overall local relapse rate was 17% (5 patients) among the 29 patients, and was 21% (5 patients) in the 24 patients who received local treatment with surgery and radiation. A similar local failure rate was reported by Matthay et al,17 who observed local recurrence in 22 (26%) of the 84 patients with high-risk NB after aggressive resection and irradiation of residual disease. Compared with these results, our results revealed that sufficient local tumor control of abdominal NB could be achieved by retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy together with primary tumor removal. In the series by La Quaglia et al,13 2 (0.05%) of 39 patients who underwent total resection had local recurrence. Thus, we can expect that adequate locoregional treatment with surgery should prevent local relapse of NB.
In addition, although this series did not deal with enough patients to evaluate any difference in survival after this surgery, it is clear that patients with localized abdominal NB had a better prognosis with this surgical procedure. The residual locoregional disease of some cancers may be more resistant to systemic adjuvant therapy than blood-borne, distant micrometastases. Moreover, local recurrence may lead to reseeding of distant metastatic sites. Therefore, locoregional control with a rational surgical intervention and intensive chemotherapy may contribute to a better outcome in patients with disseminated NB.
Aggressive surgery for retroperitoneal NB should not sacrifice vital structures or leave patients with a serious disability. We also examined the degree of surgical intervention and postoperative complications with this approach to surgical treatment. Operation time and intraoperative blood loss were considered reasonable for each stage of NB. In addition, adverse effects derived from surgery were minimal and were reduced compared with the findings from previous reports.19-22 Diarrhea was sometimes noted postoperatively, which may be associated with denervation around the celiac and superior mesenteric artery during retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy,21 but patients typically recovered in the short postoperative period. Renal atrophy is a serious complication and should be avoided by any means possible, including more meticulous surgery, in addition to intraoperative administration of prostaglandin E1.23 This complication, however, seems to occur predominantly in patients whose tumor markedly displaces renal vessels. Ejaculatory dysfunction is also a serious late complication associated with retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.24,25 Careful dissection in an effort to preserve ejaculatory function was performed around the inferior mesenteric artery in this procedure; however, long-time follow up is indispensable for the assessment of postoperative infertility.
We described the significance of the rational approach to surgery for treatment of retroperitoneal NB and subsequently discussed an evaluation of the surgical contribution to retroperitoneal NB. The precise role of surgery in the treatment of advanced NB will be clarified by future randomized trials comparing tumor resection with no resection. The optimal surgery in the current treatment of advanced NB needs to satisfy several conditions: minimal degree of surgical intervention, gross complete excision, and consequently, no delay of postoperative chemotherapy.
Corresponding author and reprints: Kazuaki Tokiwa, MD, PhD, Division of Surgery, Children's Research Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-dori, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan (e-mail: tokiwa@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp).
Accepted for publication October 19, 2002.
1.Seeger
RCBrodeur
GMSather
H
et al. Association of multiple copies of the N-
myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas.
N Engl J Med. 1985;3131111- 1116
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 2.Look
ATHayes
FAShuster
JJ
et al. Clinical relevance of tumor cell ploidy and N-
myc gene amplification in childhood neuroblastoma: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study.
J Clin Oncol. 1991;9581- 591
PubMedGoogle Scholar 3.Caron
Hvan Sluis
Pde Kraker
J
et al. Allelic loss of chromosome 1p as a predictor of unfavorable outcome in patients with neuroblastoma.
N Engl J Med. 1996;334225- 230
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 4.Nakagawara
AArima-Nakagawara
MScavarda
NJ
et al. Association between high levels of expression of the
TRK gene and favorable outcome in human neuroblastoma.
N Engl J Med. 1993;328847- 854
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 6.Nitschke
RSmith
EIShochat
S
et al. Localized neuroblastoma treated by surgery: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study.
J Clin Oncol. 1988;61271- 1279
PubMedGoogle Scholar 7.Haase
GMWong
KYde Lorimier
AA
et al. Improvement in survival after excision of primary tumor in stage III neuroblastoma.
J Pediatr Surg. 1989;24194- 200
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 8.Haase
GMAtkinson
JBStram
DO
et al. Surgical management and outcome of locoregional neuroblastoma: comparison of the children's cancer group and the international staging systems.
J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30289- 295
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 9.Powis
MRImeson
JDHolmes
SJ The effect of complete excision on stage III neuroblastoma: a report of the European Neuroblastoma Study Group.
J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31516- 519
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 12.Kaplan
ELMeier
P Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.
J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53457- 481
Google ScholarCrossref 13.La Quaglia
MPKushner
BHHeller
G
et al. Stage 4 neuroblastoma diagnosed at more than 1 year of age: gross total resection and clinical outcome.
J Pediatr Surg. 1994;291162- 1166
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 14.Mori
MMimori
KInoue
H
et al. Detection of cancer micrometastases in lymph nodes by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction.
Cancer Res. 1995;553417- 3420
PubMedGoogle Scholar 15.Raj
GVMoreno
JGGomella
LG Utilization of polymerase chain reaction technology in the detection of solid tumors.
Cancer. 1998;821419- 1442
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 16.Ikeda
HAugust
CSGoldwein
JW
et al. Sites of relapse in patients with neuroblastoma following bone marrow transplantation in relation to preparatory "debulking" treatments.
J Pediatr Surg. 1992;271438- 1441
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 17.Matthay
KKAtkinson
JBStram
DO
et al. Patterns of relapse after autologous purged bone marrow transplantation for neuroblastoma: a Childrens Cancer Group pilot study.
J Clin Oncol. 1993;112226- 2233
PubMedGoogle Scholar 18.Berthold
FHero
BBreu
H
et al. The recurrence patterns of stage I, II and III neuroblastoma: experience with 77 relapsing patients.
Ann Oncol. 1996;7183- 187
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 19.Azizkhan
RGShaw
AChandler
JG Surgical complications of neuroblastoma resection.
Surgery. 1985;97514- 517
PubMedGoogle Scholar 20.Shamberger
RCAllarde-Segundo
AKozakewich
HPW
et al. Surgical management of stage III and IV neuroblastoma: resection before or after chemotherapy?
J Pediatr Surg. 1991;261113- 1118
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 22.Cañete
AJovani
CLopez
A
et al. Surgical treatment for neuroblastoma: complications during 15 years' experience.
J Pediatr Surg. 1998;331526- 1530
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 24.Narayan
PLange
PHFraley
EE Ejaculation and fertility after extended retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer.
J Urol. 1982;127685- 688
PubMedGoogle Scholar 25.Richie
JP Clinical stage 1 testicular cancer: the role of modified retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.
J Urol. 1990;1441160- 1163
PubMedGoogle Scholar