Laparoscopic vs Open Colectomy: Outcomes Comparison Based on Large Nationwide Databases | Colorectal Surgery | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.186.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Aldoori  WHGiovannucci  ELRockett  HRSampson  LRimm  EBWillett  WC A prospective study of dietary fiber types and symptomatic diverticular disease in men.  J Nutr. 1998;128714- 719PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Roberts  PLVeidenheimer  MC Diverticular disease of the colon. Bayless  TMed. Current Therapy in Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases. Vol 3. Toronto, Ontario Decker1990;416- 419Google Scholar
3.
Kohler  LSauerland  SNeugebauer  EScientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease: results of a consensus development conference.  Surg Endosc. 1999;13430- 436PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Brodribb  AJHumphreys  DM Diverticular disease: three studies, part 1: relation to other disorders and fibre intake.  BMJ. 1976;1424- 425PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Munakata  ANakaji  STakami  HNakajima  HIwane  STuchida  S Epidemiological evaluation of colonic diverticulosis and dietary fiber in Japan.  Tohoku J Exp Med. 1993;171145- 151PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Fowler  DLWhite  SA Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1183- 188PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Not Available, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2000.  Springfield, Va National Technical Information Service2001;Also available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/nis.htm. Accessed August 6, 2003.
8.
Not Available, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample 1999.  Springfield, Va National Technical Information Service2000;Also available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/nis.htm. Accessed August 6, 2003.
9.
Not Available, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample 1998.  Springfield, Va National Technical Information Service1999;Also available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/nis.htm. Accessed August 6, 2003.
10.
Charlson  MEPompei  PAles  KLMacKenzie  CR A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.  J Chronic Dis. 1987;40373- 383PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Deyo  RACherkin  DCCiol  MA Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45613- 619PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Ross  IGentleman  R A language for data analysis and graphics.  J Compt Graph Stat. 1996;5299- 314Google Scholar
13.
Diehr  PYanez  DAsh  AHornbrook  MLin  DY Methods for analyzing health care utilization and costs.  Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20125- 144PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Wooldridge  JM Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach.  Boston, Mass South-Western College Publishing2000;
15.
Peduzzi  PConcato  JKemper  EHolford  TRFeinstein  AR A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;491373- 1379PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Katz  M Setting up a multivariable analysis: subjects.  Multivariable Analysis A Practical Guide for Clinicians. Cambridge, England Cambridge University Press1999;60- 83Google Scholar
17.
Little  RRubin  JA Statistical Analysis with Missing Data.  New York, NY John Wiley & Sons Inc1987;152- 156
18.
Hendolin  HIPaakonen  MEAlhava  EMTarvainen  RKemppinen  TLahtinen  P Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response.  Eur J Surg. 2000;166394- 399PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Sanabria  JRClavien  PACywes  RStrasberg  SM Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a matched study.  Can J Surg. 1993;36330- 336PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Faynsod  MStamos  MJArnell  TBorden  CUdani  SVargas  H A case-control study of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.  Am Surg. 2000;66841- 843PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Kohler  LRixen  DTroidl  H Laparoscopic colorectal resection for diverticulitis.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1998;1343- 47PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Sher  MEAgachan  FBortul  MNogueras  JJWeiss  EGWexner  SD Laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis.  Surg Endosc. 1997;11264- 267PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Liberman  MAPhillips  EHCarroll  BJFallas  MRosenthal  R Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis: outcome and costs.  Surg Endosc. 1996;1015- 18PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Senagore  AJDuepree  HJDelaney  CPDissanaike  SBrady  KMFazio  VW Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45485- 490PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Chen  HHWexner  SDWeiss  EG  et al.  Laparoscopic colectomy for benign colorectal disease is associated with a significant reduction in disability as compared with laparotomy.  Surg Endosc. 1998;121397- 1400PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Stocchi  LNelson  HYoung-Fadok  TMLarson  DRIlstrup  DM Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43326- 332PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Bruce  CJColler  JAMurray  JJSchoetz Jr  DJRoberts  PLRusin  LC Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(suppl)S1- S6PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Weeks  JCNelson  HGelber  SSargent  DSchroeder  G Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.  JAMA. 2002;287321- 328PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Schwenk  WBohm  BMuller  JM Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections: a prospective randomized trial.  Surg Endosc. 1998;121131- 1136PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Lord  RVSloane  DR Early discharge after open appendicectomy.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1996;66361- 365PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Ramesh  SGalland  RB Early discharge from hospital after open appendicectomy.  Br J Surg. 1993;801192- 1193PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Millat  BFingerhut  AGignoux  MHay  JMFrench Associations for Surgical Research, Factors associated with early discharge after inguinal hernia repair in 500 consecutive unselected patients.  Br J Surg. 1993;801158- 1160PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Lauro  AAlonso Poza  ACirocchi  R  et al.  Laparoscopic surgery for colon diverticulitis.  Minerva Chir. 2002;571- 5PubMedGoogle Scholar
34.
Tuech  JJPessaux  PRouge  CRegenet  NBergamaschi  RArnaud  JP Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly.  Surg Endosc. 2000;141031- 1033PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Trebuchet  GLechaux  DLecalve  JL Laparoscopic left colon resection for diverticular disease.  Surg Endosc. 2002;1618- 21PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Vargas  HDRamirez  RTHoffman  GC  et al.  Defining the role of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;431726- 1731PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Eijsbouts  QACuesta  MAde Brauw  LMSietses  C Elective laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection for diverticular disease.  Surg Endosc. 1997;11750- 753PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Siriser  F Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for diverticular sigmoiditis: a single-surgeon prospective study of 65 patients.  Surg Endosc. 1999;13811- 813PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Smadja  CSbai Idrissi  MTahrat  M  et al.  Elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis: results of a prospective study.  Surg Endosc. 1999;13645- 648PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Bouillot  JLAouad  KBadawy  AAlamowitch  BAlexandre  JH Elective laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for diverticular disease: a prospective study in 50 patients.  Surg Endosc. 1998;121393- 1396PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Carbajo Caballero  MAMartin del Olmo  JCBlanco  JIde la Cuesta  CAtienza  R The laparoscopic approach in the treatment of diverticular colon disease.  JSLS. April-June1998;2159- 161Google Scholar
42.
Kockerling  FSchneider  CReymond  MA  et al. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG), Early results of a prospective multicenter study on 500 consecutive cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.  Surg Endosc. 1998;1237- 41PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Stewart  BTStitz  RWLumley  JW Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly.  Br J Surg. 1999;86938- 941PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Berthou  JCCharbonneau  P Elective laparoscopic management of sigmoid diverticulitis: results in a series of 110 patients.  Surg Endosc. 1999;13457- 460PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Comparative Analysis of HCUP and NHDS Inpatient Discharge Data.  Technical Supplement 13, NIS Release 5 Rockville, Md Agency for Health Care Policy and ResearchAvailable at: http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/nhds/niscomp.htm. Accessed December 7, 2002.Google Scholar
46.
Health Cost and Utilization Project, 1999 HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) Comparison Report. Available at: http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/nisdoc00/nis_comparison_report_1999.pdf. Accessed December 7, 2002.
47.
Franklin Jr  MEDorman  JPJacobs  MPlasencia  G Is laparoscopic surgery applicable to complicated colonic diverticular disease?  Surg Endosc. 1997;111021- 1025PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Tuech  JJPessaux  PRegenet  N  et al.  Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective study in the elderly.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;481045- 1047PubMedGoogle Scholar
49.
Brenneman  FDWright  JGKennedy  EDMcLeod  RS Outcomes research in surgery.  World J Surg. 1999;231220- 1223PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Article
November 1, 2003

Laparoscopic vs Open Colectomy: Outcomes Comparison Based on Large Nationwide Databases

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center (Dr Guller), and Center for Excellence in Surgical Outcomes (Drs Guller, Jain, Hervey, and Pietrobon and Ms Purves) and the Division of Orthopedic Surgery (Drs Jain and Pietrobon), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Arch Surg. 2003;138(11):1179-1186. doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1179
Abstract

Hypothesis  Laparoscopic colectomy has significant advantages over open colectomy in the treatment of diverticular disease with respect to the length of hospital stay, routine hospital discharge, and postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Design  Retrospective secondary data analysis.

Patients and Setting  Patients with primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes for laparoscopic (709 patients [3.8%]) and open sigmoid resection (17 735 patients [96.2%]) were selected from the 1998, 1999, and 2000 Nationwide Inpatient Samples. These databases represent 20% stratified probability samples of all US community hospital discharges. Sampling weights were used to allow generalization of the study findings to the overall US population. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the risk-adjusted association between the surgery type and patient outcomes.

Main Outcome Measures  Length of hospital stay, in-hospital complications, in-hospital mortality, and the rate of routine discharge.

Results  The patients had a mean age of 59.8 years; they were preponderantly white (89.1%) and female (54.0%). After adjusting for other covariates, laparoscopic sigmoidectomy was associated with a shorter mean hospital stay (laparoscopic sigmoidectomy vs open sigmoidectomy, 7.47 vs 9.37 days; P<.001), fewer gastrointestinal tract complications (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.93; P = .03), a lower overall complication rate (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.88; P = .007), and a higher routine hospital discharge rate (odds ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-3.21; P<.001).

Conclusion  Laparoscopic sigmoid resection in patients with diverticular disease has statistically and clinically significant advantages over open sigmoid resection with respect to the length of hospital stay, rate of routine hospital discharge, and postoperative in-hospital morbidity.

×