Hospital Teaching Status and Outcomes of Complex Surgical Procedures in the United States | Gastrointestinal Surgery | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Ayanian  JZWeissman  JS Teaching hospitals and quality of care: a review of the literature.  Milbank Q. 2002;80569- 593PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Hutter  MMGlasgow  REMulvihill  SJ Does the participation of a surgical trainee adversely impact patient outcomes? a study of major pancreatic resections in California.  Surgery. 2000;128286- 292PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Allison  JJKiefe  CIWeissman  NW  et al.  Relationship of hospital teaching status with quality of care and mortality for Medicare patients with acute MI.  JAMA. 2000;2841256- 1262PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Rosenthal  GEHarper  DLQuinn  LMCooper  GS Severity-adjusted mortality and length of stay in teaching and nonteaching hospitals: results of a regional study.  JAMA. 1997;278485- 490PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Birkmeyer  JDSiewers  AEFinlayson  EV  et al.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.  N Engl J Med. 2002;3461128- 1137PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Birkmeyer  JD Should we regionalize major surgery? potential benefits and policy considerations.  J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190341- 349PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Begg  CBCramer  LDHoskins  WJBrennan  MF Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.  JAMA. 1998;2801747- 1751PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Dimick  JBCattaneo  SLipsett  PAPronovost  PJHeitmiller  RF Hospital volume is related to clinical and economic outcomes of esophageal resection in Maryland.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72334- 340PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Dimick  JBCowan Jr  JAKnol  JAUpchurch Jr  GR Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes.  Arch Surg. 2003;138185- 191PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Not Available, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP-6): Nationwide Inpatient Sample, Release 6.  Rockville, Md Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality1997;
11.
Not Available, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.  Washington, DC Public Health Service, US Dept of Health and Human Services1988;
12.
Romano  PSRoos  LLJollis  JG Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;461075- 1079PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Charlson  MEPompei  PAles  KLMacKenzie  CR A new method for classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.  J Chronic Dis. 1987;40373- 383PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Deyo  RACherkin  DCCiol  MA Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45613- 619PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Dimick  JBPronovost  PJHeitmiller  RFLipsett  PA Intensive care unit physician staffing is associated with decreased length of stay, hospital cost, and complications after esophageal resection.  Crit Care Med. 2001;29753- 758PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Amaravadi  RDimick  JBPronovost  PJLipsett  PA ICU nurse-to-patient ratio is associated with postoperative complications and resource use after esophagectomy.  Intensive Care Med. 2000;261857- 1862PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Article
February 1, 2004

Hospital Teaching Status and Outcomes of Complex Surgical Procedures in the United States

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.

Arch Surg. 2004;139(2):137-141. doi:10.1001/archsurg.139.2.137
Abstract

Hypothesis  Complex operations performed in teaching hospitals have similar outcomes as those performed in nonteaching hospitals.

Design  Observational cohort study with clinical patient data obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample data were linked to the American Hospital Association hospital survey data for 1997 to determine hospital characteristics. Hospitals were considered high volume if they performed more than the median (50th percentile) number of procedures per year.

Setting  Nationally representative sample of hospitals during 1996 and 1997.

Patients  Individuals undergoing esophageal resection (n = 1247), hepatic resection (n = 2073), or pancreatic resection (n = 3337) in Nationwide Inpatient Sample hospitals during 1996 and 1997 were included.

Main Outcomes Measures  Unadjusted and adjusted in-hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay (>75th percentile).

Results  None of the procedures had higher operative mortality rates at teaching hospitals. In unadjusted analyses, pancreatic resection (4.0% vs 8.8%; P<.001), hepatic resection (5.3% vs 8.0%; P = .03), and esophageal resection (7.7% vs 10.2%; P = .10) had lower operative mortality rates at teaching compared with nonteaching hospitals. However, after adjusting for hospital volume in the multivariate analysis, hospital teaching status was no longer a predictor of operative mortality.

Conclusions  Teaching hospitals have lower operative mortality rates for complex surgical procedures. However, the lower mortality rates at teaching hospitals can be explained by higher procedural volume.

×