Answer: Inverted Meckel Diverticulum
Helical computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis after contrast shows the “target”-shaped area within 1 of the small-bowel loops, consistent with ileoileal intussusception (Figure 1). The patient underwent resection of the mass with an 8-cm margin from each side. The small bowel was then reconnected with a primary anastomosis. The patient was discharged home on postoperative day 4.
Pathologic examination of the specimen confirmed the diagnosis of inverted Meckel diverticulum with heterotopic pancreatic tissue and acute ischemic enteritis with serositis. Meckel diverticulum is the most common congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal tract, occurring in 2% to 3% of the population1and often asymptomatic. Clinical symptoms arise from complications, which occur in 4.2% to 6.4% of those harboring the diverticulum.2,3The lifetime risk of complications is likely independent of age, although they are more common in men than women.4
Intestinal obstruction is the most common complication in adults with Meckel diverticula.5This may be caused by intussusception, volvulus, luminal obstruction from an inverted diverticulum, diverticulitis or a foreign body inside the diverticulum, inclusion of a diverticulum into a hernia, or neoplastic obstruction.
Heterotopic pancreatic tissue is found in 5% to 16% of resected Meckel diverticula.6,7The heterotopic pancreatic tissue may be located in the distal tip of the diverticulum and serve as a lead point for intussusception.
Only a few cases of inverted Meckel diverticulum have been reported.6,8Clinically, these patients present with bleeding, melena, and acute abdominal pain. Our case is unique because the patient presented with chronic diarrhea and intermittent abdominal pain.
Although a preoperative diagnosis of intussuscepted Meckel diverticulum has traditionally been based on an enteric contrast study or ultrasonography, computed tomography has been shown to be equally accurate if not more so.9A classic feature of this ileoileal intussusception is the target lesion, which helped the diagnosis in this case.
Correspondence:David Jacobsen, MD, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
Accepted for Publication:May 25, 2005.
2.Soltero
MJBill
AH The natural history of Meckel's Diverticulum and its relation to incidental removal: a study of 202 cases of diseased Meckel's Diverticulum found in King County, Washington, over a fifteen year period.
Am J Surg 1976;132168- 173
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 3.Cullen
JJKelly
KAMoir
CRHodge
DOZinsmeister
ARMelton
LJ
III Surgical management of Meckel's diverticulum: an epidemiologic, population-based study.
Ann Surg 1994;220564- 569
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 5.Fa-si-Oen
PRRoumen
RMCroiset van Uchelen
FA Complications and management of Meckel's diverticulum—a review.
Eur J Surg 1999;165674- 678
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 6.Pantongrag-Brown
LLevine
MSElsayed
AMBuetow
PCAgrons
GABuck
JL Inverted Meckel diverticulum: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings.
Radiology 1996;199693- 696
PubMedGoogle Scholar 7.Groebli
YBertin
DMorel
P Meckel's diverticulum in adults: retrospective analysis of 119 cases and historical review.
Eur J Surg 2001;167518- 524
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 8.Dujardin
MOp de beeck
BOsteaux
M Inverted Meckel's diverticulum as a leading point for ileoileal intussusception in an adult: case report.
Abdom Imaging 2002;27563- 565
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 9.Goldmann
AHaberle
HJWallner
BSchnarkowski
PFriedrich
JM Computed tomographic aspects of intestinal intussusception [in German].
Aktuelle Radiol 1992;2100- 103
PubMedGoogle Scholar