Long-term Outcomes of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy vs Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials | Colorectal Surgery | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Pescatori  MFavetta  UDedola  SOrsini  S Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosa prolapse.  Tech Coloproctol 1997;196- 98Google Scholar
2.
Longo  A Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure.  Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery Bologna, Italy Monduzzi Editore1998;777- 784Google Scholar
3.
Nisar  PJAcheson  AGNeal  KRScholefield  JH Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials [in German].  Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47 (11) 1837- 1845PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Tjandra  JJChan  MK Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy).  Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50 (6) 878- 892PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Jayaraman  SColquhoun  PHMalthaner  RA Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;4 (CD005393) 10.1002/14651858.CD005393PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Pescatori  MGagliardi  G Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures.  Tech Coloproctol 2008;12 (1) 7- 19PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Giordano  PBradley  BMPeiris  L Obliteration of the rectal lumen after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: report of a case.  Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51 (10) 1574- 1576PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Ripetti  VCaricato  MArullani  A Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations.  Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45 (2) 268- 270PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Molloy  RGKingsmore  D Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.  Lancet 2000;355 (9206) 810PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Filingeri  VGravante  G Pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema of the neck after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.  Tech Coloproctol 2005;9 (1) 86PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Kanellos  IBlouhos  KDemetriades  HPramateftakis  MGBetsis  D Pneumomediastinum after dilatation of anal stricture following stapled hemorrhoidopexy.  Tech Coloproctol 2004;8 (3) 185- 187PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
McDonald  PJBona  RCohen  CR Rectovaginal fistula after stapled haemorrhoidopexy.  Colorectal Dis 2004;6 (1) 64- 65PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Blouhos  KVasiliadis  KTsalis  KBotsios  DVrakas  X Uncontrollable intra-abdominal bleeding necessitating low anterior resection of the rectum after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: report of a case.  Surg Today 2007;37 (3) 254- 257PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
McCloud  JMDoucas  HScott  ADJameson  JS Delayed presentation of life-threatening perineal sepsis following stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a case report.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89 (3) 301- 302PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Jadad  ARMoore  RACarroll  D  et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?  Control Clin Trials 1996;17 (1) 1- 12PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Senagore  AJSinger  MAbcarian  H  et al. Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH) Multicenter Study Group, A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results.  Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47 (11) 1824- 1836PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Hetzer  FHDemartines  NHandschin  AEClavien  PA Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial.  Arch Surg 2002;137 (3) 337- 340PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Au-Yong  IRowsell  MHemingway  DM Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs conventional haemorrhoidectomy: a three and a half year follow up.  Colorectal Dis 2004;6 (1) 37- 38PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Kairaluoma  MNuorva  KKellokumpu  I Day-case stapled (circular) versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome.  Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46 (1) 93- 99PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Ortiz  HMarzo  JArmendariz  P Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.  Br J Surg 2002;89 (11) 1376- 1381PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Ortiz  HMarzo  JArmendáriz  PDe Miguel  M Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature.  Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48 (4) 809- 815PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Boccasanta  PCapretti  PGVenturi  M  et al.  Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse.  Am J Surg 2001;182 (1) 64- 68PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Van de Stadt  JD’Hoore  ADuinslaeger  MChasse  EPenninckx  FBelgian Section of Colorectal Surgery Royal Belgian Society for Surgery, Long-term results after excision haemorrhoidectomy versus stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids: a Belgian prospective randomized trial.  Acta Chir Belg 2005;105 (1) 44- 52PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Racalbuto  AAliotta  ICorsaro  GLanteri  RDi Cataldo  ALicata  A Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial.  Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;19 (3) 239- 244PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Smyth  EFBaker  RPWilken  BJHartley  JEWhite  TJMonson  JR Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial.  Lancet 2003;361 (9367) 1437- 1438PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Shalaby  RDesoky  A Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.  Br J Surg 2001;88 (8) 1049- 1053PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
Gravié  JFLehur  PAHuten  N  et al.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up.  Ann Surg 2005;242 (1) 29- 35PubMedGoogle Scholar
28.
Ganio  EAltomare  DFMilito  GGabrielli  FCanuti  S Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.  Br J Surg 2007;94 (8) 1033- 1037PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Basdanis  GPapadopoulos  VNMichalopoulos  AApostolidis  SHarlaftis  N Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles.  Surg Endosc 2005;19 (2) 235- 239PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Ascanelli  SGregorio  CTonini  GBaccarini  MAzzena  G Long stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus Milligan-Morgan procedure: short- and long-term results of a randomised, controlled, prospective trial.  Chir Ital 2005;57 (4) 439- 447PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Wilson  MSPope  VDoran  HEFearn  SJBrough  WA Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial.  Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45 (11) 1437- 1444PubMedGoogle Scholar
32.
Kraemer  MParulava  TRoblick  MDuschka  LMüller-Lobeck  H Prospective, randomized study: proximate PPH stapler vs. LigaSure for hemorrhoidal surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48 (8) 1517- 1522PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Bikhchandani  JAgarwal  PNKant  RMalik  VK Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy.  Am J Surg 2005;189 (1) 56- 60PubMedGoogle Scholar
34.
Khalil  KHO'Bichere  ASellu  D Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy.  Br J Surg 2000;87 (10) 1352- 1355PubMedGoogle Scholar
35.
Lau  PYMeng  WCYip  AW Stapled haemorrhoidectomy in Chinese patients: a prospective randomised control study.  Hong Kong Med J 2004;10 (6) 373- 377PubMedGoogle Scholar
36.
Brown  SRBallan  KHo  EHo Fams  YHSeow-Choen  F Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy.  Colorectal Dis 2001;3 (3) 175- 178PubMedGoogle Scholar
37.
Cheetham  MJCohen  CRKamm  MAPhillips  RK A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up.  Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46 (4) 491- 497PubMedGoogle Scholar
38.
Palimento  DPicchio  MAttanasio  ULombardi  ABambini  CRenda  A Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results.  World J Surg 2003;27 (2) 203- 207PubMedGoogle Scholar
39.
Correa-Rovelo  JMTellez  OObregón  LMiranda-Gomez  AMoran  S Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial.  Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45 (10) 1367- 1374PubMedGoogle Scholar
40.
Pavlidis  TPapaziogas  BSouparis  APatsas  AKoutelidakis  IPapaziogas  T Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.  Int J Colorectal Dis 2002;17 (1) 50- 53PubMedGoogle Scholar
41.
Ganio  EAltomare  DFGabrielli  FMilito  GCanuti  S Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy.  Br J Surg 2001;88 (5) 669- 674PubMedGoogle Scholar
42.
Helmy  MA Stapling procedure for hemorrhoids versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy.  J Egypt Soc Parasitol 2000;30 (3) 951- 958PubMedGoogle Scholar
43.
Ho  YHCheong  WKTsang  C  et al.  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness: randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months.  Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43 (12) 1666- 1675PubMedGoogle Scholar
44.
Mehigan  BJMonson  JRHartley  JE Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.  Lancet 2000;355 (9206) 782- 785PubMedGoogle Scholar
45.
Rowsell  MBello  MHemingway  DM Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.  Lancet 2000;355 (9206) 779- 781PubMedGoogle Scholar
46.
Ho  KSHo  YH Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.  Tech Coloproctol 2006;10 (3) 193- 197PubMedGoogle Scholar
47.
Chung  CCCheung  HYChan  ESKwok  SYLi  MK Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized trial.  Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48 (6) 1213- 1219PubMedGoogle Scholar
48.
Lomanto  DKatara  AN Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed haemorrhoids: short- and long-term experience.  Asian J Surg 2007;30 (1) 29- 33PubMedGoogle Scholar
49.
Ohana  GMyslovaty  BAriche  A  et al.  Mid-term results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for third- and fourth-degree hemorrhoids: correlation with the histological features of the resected tissue.  World J Surg 2007;31 (6) 1338- 1344Google Scholar
50.
Zacharakis  EKanellos  DPramateftakis  MG  et al.  Long-term results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy for fourth-degree haemorrhoids: a prospective study with median follow-up of 6 years.  Tech Coloproctol 2007;11 (2) 144- 147PubMedGoogle Scholar
51.
Finco  CSarzo  GSavastano  SDegregori  SMerigliano  S Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile?  Colorectal Dis 2006;8 (2) 130- 134PubMedGoogle Scholar
52.
Kanellos  IZacharakis  EKanellos  DPramateftakis  MGTsachalis  TBetsis  D Long-term results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy for third-degree haemorrhoids.  Tech Coloproctol 2006;10 (1) 47- 49PubMedGoogle Scholar
53.
Picchio  MPalimento  DAttanasio  URenda  A Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial.  Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21 (7) 668- 669PubMedGoogle Scholar
54.
Huang  WSChin  CCYeh  CHLin  PYWang  JY Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study.  Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22 (8) 955- 961PubMedGoogle Scholar
55.
Mattana  CCoco  CManno  A  et al.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in the cure of fourth-degree hemorrhoids: long-term evaluation and clinical results.  Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50 (11) 1770- 1775PubMedGoogle Scholar
56.
Farouk  RDuthie  GSLee  PWMonson  JR Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long-term follow-up.  Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41 (7) 888- 891PubMedGoogle Scholar
57.
Ho  YHTsang  CTang  CLNyam  DEu  KWSeow-Choen  F Anal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomised, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry.  Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43 (2) 169- 173PubMedGoogle Scholar
Review
March 16, 2009

Long-term Outcomes of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy vs Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Colorectal Surgery, Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, England (Drs Giordano, Gravante, Ovens, and Nastro); and Laboratory of Biometry, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy (Dr Sorge).

Arch Surg. 2009;144(3):266-272. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2008.591
Abstract

Objectives  To assess the long-term results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) and to define the role of SH in the treatment of hemorrhoids.

Data Sources  Published randomized controlled trials of CH vs SH with a minimum clinical follow-up of 12 months were searched and selected in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases using the keywords hemorrhoid, stapl, and anopexy, without language restrictions.

Study Selection  Potentially relevant studies were identified by the title and the abstract, and full articles were obtained and assessed in detail.

Data Extraction  Studies were scored according to the presence of 3 key methodologic features of randomization, blinding, and accountability of all patients, including withdrawals, and the scores ranged from 0 to 5. Studies that received a score from 3 to 5 were considered high-quality studies, whereas those with a score of 2 or less were considered of low quality. A specifically designed data form was used to collect all relevant data, including details of the experimental design, patient demographics, technical aspects, outcome measures, and complications.

Data Synthesis  Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria for a total of 1201 patients. Outcomes at a minimum of 1 year showed a significantly higher rate of prolapse recurrences in the SH group (14 studies, 1063 patients; odds ratio, 5.5; P < .001) and patients were more likely to undergo further treatment to correct recurrent prolapses compared with the CH group (10 studies, 824 patients; odds ratio, 1.9; P = .02).

Conclusion  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a safe technique for the treatment of hemorrhoids but carries a significantly higher incidence of recurrences and additional operations compared with CH. It is the patient's choice whether to accept a higher recurrence rate to take advantage of the short-term benefits of SH.

×