Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Both the recent article and accompanying commentary1 regarding carotid endarterectomy as the criterion standard for revascularization missed the point. Nearly half the patients in the study were asymptomatic. For most of them, revascularization was unwarranted. Transcranial Doppler embolus detection has been shown to identify patients with carotid stenosis who are at higher risk.2,3
We reported in 20054 that transcranial Doppler embolus detection was extremely effective at identifying which patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis may benefit from revascularization. Only 10% of our patients had microemboli, and their 1-year risk of stroke was 15.6%, so they would probably benefit from revascularization. However, the 90% of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis without microemboli had only a 1% risk of stroke, with a very tight 95% confidence interval: 1.01% to 1.36%. They cannot benefit unless the procedure can be done with a risk of less than 1%.
Thus, even the commendable surgical results reported by Suliman et al1 carry more than twice the risk of medical therapy. Patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis are better off with medical therapy unless they have microemboli on transcranial Doppler. In recent years, with more intensive medical therapy, this now represents less than 5% of patients. The criterion standard for patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis is neither carotid endarterectomy nor stenting: it is intensive medical therapy.
Correspondence: Dr Spence, Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, 1400 Western Rd, London, ON N6G 2V2, Canada (email@example.com).
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Spence JD. Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Criterion Standard Should Be Medical Therapy. Arch Surg. 2009;144(4):382–383. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.16
Create a personal account or sign in to: