Surgeon- and System-Based Influences on Trauma Mortality | Emergency Medicine | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.206.238.77. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Prystowsky  JB Are young surgeons competent to perform alimentary tract surgery?  Arch Surg 2005;140 (5) 495- 502PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Vickers  AJBianco  FJSerio  AM  et al.  The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy.  J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99 (15) 1171- 1177PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Richardson  JDSchmieg  RBoaz  P  et al.  Impact of trauma attending surgeon case volume on outcome: is more better?  J Trauma 1998;44 (2) 266- 272PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Dimick  JBCowan  JA  JrStanley  JCHenke  PKPronovost  PJUpchurch  GR  Jr Surgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States.  J Vasc Surg 2003;38 (4) 739- 744PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Cowan  JA  JrDimick  JBThompson  BGStanley  JCUpchurch  GR  Jr Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume.  J Am Coll Surg 2002;195 (6) 814- 821PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Pearce  WHParker  MAFeinglass  JUjiki  MManheim  LM The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures.  J Vasc Surg 1999;29 (5) 768- 778PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Pal  NAxisa  BYusof  S  et al.  Volume and outcome for major upper GI surgery in England.  J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12 (2) 353- 357PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Rogers  SO  JrWolf  REZaslavsky  AMWright  WEAyanian  JZ Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery.  Ann Surg 2006;244 (6) 1003- 1011PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Schrag  DPanageas  KSRiedel  E  et al.  Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection.  Ann Surg 2002;236 (5) 583- 592PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Glance  LGDick  AWOsler  TMMukamel  DB The relation between surgeon volume and outcome following off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.  Chest 2005;128 (2) 829- 837PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Hughes  RGGarnick  DWLuft  HS McPhee  SJHunt  SS Hospital volume and patient outcomes: the case of hip fracture patients.  Med Care 1988;26 (11) 1057- 1067PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Sava  JKennedy  SJordan  MWang  D Does volume matter? the effect of trauma surgeons' caseload on mortality.  J Trauma 2003;54 (5) 829- 834PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
London  JABattistella  FD Is there a relationship between trauma center volume and mortality?  J Trauma 2003;54 (1) 16- 25PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Smith  RFFrateschi  LSloan  EP  et al.  The impact of volume on outcome in seriously injured trauma patients: two years' experience of the Chicago Trauma System.  J Trauma 1990;30 (9) 1066- 1076PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Konvolinka  CWCopes  WSSacco  WJ Institution and per-surgeon volume versus survival outcome in Pennsylvania's trauma centers.  Am J Surg 1995;170 (4) 333- 340PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Haut  ERChang  DCEfron  DTCornwell  EE  III Injured patients have lower mortality when treated by “full-time” trauma surgeons vs. surgeons who cover trauma “part-time.”  J Trauma 2006;61 (2) 272- 279PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Demetriades  DBerne  TVBelzberg  H  et al.  The impact of a dedicated trauma program on outcome in severely injured patients.  Arch Surg 1995;130 (2) 216- 220PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Cornwell  EE  IIIChang  DCPhillips  JCampbell  KA Enhanced trauma program commitment at a level I trauma center: effect on the process and outcome of care.  Arch Surg 2003;138 (8) 838- 843PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
MacKenzie  EJRivara  FPJurkovich  GJ  et al.  A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality.  N Engl J Med 2006;354 (4) 366- 378PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Scarborough  KSlone  DSUribe  PCraun  MBar-Or  RBar-Or  D Reduced mortality at a community hospital trauma center: the impact of changing trauma level designation from II to I.  Arch Surg 2008;143 (1) 22- 28PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Haas  BJurkovich  GJWang  JRivara  FPMackenzie  EJNathens  AB Survival advantage in trauma centers: expeditious intervention or experience?  J Am Coll Surg 2009;208 (1) 28- 36PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Chang  DCornwell  EE  IIIPhillips  JBaker  DYonas  MCampbell  K Community characteristics and demographic information as determinants for a hospital-based injury prevention outreach program.  Arch Surg 2003;138 (12) 1344- 1346PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Efron  DTHaider  AChang  DHaut  ERBrooke  BCornwell  EE  III Alarming surge in nonsurvivable urban trauma and the case for violence prevention [published correction appears in Arch Surg. 2006;141(10):1042].  Arch Surg 2006;141 (8) 800- 805PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Sackett  DLRosenberg  WMGray  JAHaynes  RBRichardson  WS Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.  BMJ 1996;312 (7023) 71- 72PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Moore  FA Evidence-based medical information technology: the next generation.  J Trauma 2007;63 (6) 1195- 1205PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Maier  RV What the surgeon of tomorrow needs to know about evidence-based surgery.  Arch Surg 2006;141 (3) 317- 323PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). 7th ed. Chicago, IL American College of Surgeons2004;
28.
Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST), Trauma practice guidelines. http://www.east.org/tpg.asp. Accessed December 27, 2007
29.
Cipolle  MDWojcik  RSeislove  EWasser  TEPasquale  MD The role of surveillance duplex scanning in preventing venous thromboembolism in trauma patients.  J Trauma 2002;52 (3) 453- 462PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Kozar  RA McQuiggan  MMMoore  EEKudsk  KAJurkovich  GJMoore  FA Postinjury enteral tolerance is reliably achieved by a standardized protocol.  J Surg Res 2002;104 (1) 70- 75PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Balogh  ZCaldwell  EHeetveld  M  et al.  Institutional practice guidelines on management of pelvic fracture-related hemodynamic instability: do they make a difference?  J Trauma 2005;58 (4) 778- 782PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Earley  ASGracias  VHHaut  ER  et al.  Anemia Management Program (AMP) reduces transfusion volumes, incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and cost in trauma patients.  J Trauma 2006;61 (1) 1- 7PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Rogers  FBSimons  RHoyt  DBShackford  SRHolbrook  TFortlage  D In-house board-certified surgeons improve outcome for severely injured patients: a comparison of two university centers.  J Trauma 1993;34 (6) 871- 877PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Luchette  FKelly  BDavis  K  et al.  Impact of the in-house trauma surgeon on initial patient care, outcome, and cost.  J Trauma 1997;42 (3) 490- 497PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Fakhry  SMWatts  DDMichetti  CHunt  JPEAST Multi-Institutional Blunt Hollow Viscous Injury Research Group, The resident experience on trauma: declining surgical opportunities and career incentives? analysis of data from a large multi-institutional study.  J Trauma 2003;54 (1) 1- 8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Brooks  AButcher  WWalsh  MLambert  ABrowne  JRyan  J The experience and training of British general surgeons in trauma surgery for the abdomen, thorax and major vessels.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2002;84 (6) 409- 413PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Reilly  PMSchwab  CWHaut  ER  et al.  Training in trauma surgery: quantitative and qualitative aspects of a new paradigm for fellowship.  Ann Surg 2003;238 (4) 596- 604PubMedGoogle Scholar
38.
Diaz  JJ  JrMiller  RSMay  AKMorris  JA  Jr Acute care surgery: a functioning program and fellowship training.  Surgery 2007;141 (3) 310- 316PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Ciesla  DJMoore  EEMoore  JBJohnson  JLCothren  CCBurch  JM The academic trauma center is a model for the future trauma and acute care surgeon.  J Trauma 2005;58 (4) 657- 662PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Garland  AMRiskin  DJBrundage  SI  et al.  A county hospital surgical practice: a model for acute care surgery.  Am J Surg 2007;194 (6) 758- 764PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Moore  EEKnudson  MMSchwab  CWTrunkey  DDJohannigman  JAHolcomb  JB Military-civilian collaboration in trauma care and the senior visiting surgeon program.  N Engl J Med 2007;357 (26) 2723- 2727PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Article
August 14, 2009

Surgeon- and System-Based Influences on Trauma Mortality

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs Haut, Chang, Hayanga, Efron, and Haider); and Department of Surgery, Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC (Dr Cornwell).

Arch Surg. 2009;144(8):759-764. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.100
Abstract

Hypothesis  The mechanism by which trauma systems improve mortality is unknown. Outcomes may be influenced by experienced trauma surgeons treating more patients (surgeon effect) or improving the overall system of care (system effect). We hypothesized that mortality is lower in patients treated by a fellowship-trained senior trauma program director (experienced) vs first-year general surgery attending surgeon (novice) and that patient mortality for novice surgeons would improve after adding a new senior trauma director.

Design  Retrospective cohort study.

Setting  Academic level I trauma center.

Patients  Individuals who had experienced trauma.

Main Outcome Measures  We concurrently compared mortality in trauma patients treated by an experienced trauma surgeon with those admitted by novice surgeons during 5½ years. We also compared mortality in patients treated by novice surgeons before vs after implementation of a more structured trauma program. The χ2 test and multiple logistic regression analysis were used to compare the groups. Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for death were examined.

Results  Concurrent comparison of patients treated by novice surgeons vs experienced trauma surgeons demonstrated no difference in mortality (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-2.15). At unadjusted univariate analysis, mortality in patients treated by novice surgeons significantly improved over time in the blunt trauma group and all emergency department survivor subgroups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly improved mortality over time in patients treated by novice surgeons (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.85).

Conclusions  In a structured trauma program, there is no mortality difference between novice surgeons and their experienced trauma director. The organized trauma program and senior surgical mentoring overpower any influence of individual surgeon inexperience.

×