Revisional Bariatric Surgery: 13-Year Experience From a Tertiary Institution | Bariatric Surgery | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Maggard  MAShugarman  LRSuttorp  M  et al.  Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity.  Ann Intern Med 2005;142 (7) 547- 559PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Sjöström  LLindroos  AKPeltonen  M  et al. Swedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific Group, Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery.  N Engl J Med 2004;351 (26) 2683- 2693PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Santry  HPGillen  DLLauderdale  DS Trends in bariatric surgical procedures.  JAMA 2005;294 (15) 1909- 1917PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Schwartz  RWStrodel  WESimpson  WSGriffen  WO  Jr Gastric bypass revision: lessons learned from 920 cases.  Surgery 1988;104 (4) 806- 812PubMedGoogle Scholar
Buckwalter  JAHerbst  CA  JrKhouri  RK Morbid obesity: second gastric operations for poor weight loss.  Am Surg 1985;51 (4) 208- 211PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kalfarentzos  FPapadoulas  SSkroubis  GKehagias  ILoukidi  AMead  N Prospective evaluation of biliopancreatic diversion with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the super obese.  J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8 (4) 479- 488PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
van Gemert  WGvan Wersch  MMGreve  JWSoeters  PB Revisional surgery after failed vertical banded gastroplasty: restoration of vertical banded gastroplasty or conversion to gastric bypass.  Obes Surg 1998;8 (1) 21- 28PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Szold  AAbu-Abeid  S Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity: results and complications in 715 patients.  Surg Endosc 2002;16 (2) 230- 233PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Gavert  NSzold  AAbu-Abeid  S Safety and feasibility of revisional laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity: conversion of open Silastic vertical banded gastroplasty to laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.  Surg Endosc 2004;18 (2) 203- 206PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Suter  M Laparoscopic band repositioning for pouch dilatation/slippage after gastric banding: disappointing results.  Obes Surg 2001;11 (4) 507- 512PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Nesset  EMKendrick  MLHoughton  SG  et al.  A two-decade spectrum of revisional bariatric surgery at a tertiary referral center.  Surg Obes Relat Dis 2007;3 (1) 25- 30PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Sugerman  HJKellum  JM  JrDeMaria  EJReines  HD Conversion of failed or complicated vertical banded gastroplasty to gastric bypass in morbid obesity.  Am J Surg 1996;171 (2) 263- 269PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Westling  AOhrvall  MGustavsson  S Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after previous unsuccessful gastric restrictive surgery.  J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6 (2) 206- 211PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Weber  MMüller  MKMichel  JM  et al.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, but not rebanding, should be proposed as rescue procedure for patients with failed laparoscopic gastric banding.  Ann Surg 2003;238 (6) 827- 833PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Cariani  SNottola  DGrani  SVittimberga  GLucchi  AAmenta  E Complications after gastroplasty and gastric bypass as a primary operation and as a reoperation.  Obes Surg 2001;11 (4) 487- 490PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Cummings  DEWeigle  DSFrayo  RS  et al.  Plasma ghrelin levels after diet-induced weight loss or gastric bypass surgery.  N Engl J Med 2002;346 (21) 1623- 1630PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Gardiner  JVJayasena  CNBloom  SR Gut hormones: a weight off your mind.  J Neuroendocrinol 2008;20 (6) 834- 841PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Skroubis  GSakellaropoulos  GPouggouras  KMead  NNikiforidis  GKalfarentzos  F Comparison of nutritional deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and after biliopancreatic diversion with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.  Obes Surg 2002;12 (4) 551- 558PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Skroubis  GAnesidis  SKehagias  IMead  NVagenas  KKalfarentzos  F Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus a variant of biliopancreatic diversion in a non-superobese population: prospective comparison of the efficacy and the incidence of metabolic deficiencies.  Obes Surg 2006;16 (4) 488- 495PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Papasavas  PKCaushaj  PFMcCormick  JT  et al.  Laparoscopic management of complications following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.  Surg Endosc 2003;17 (4) 610- 614PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Balsiger  BMMurr  MMMai  JSarr  MG Gastroesophageal reflux after intact vertical banded gastroplasty: correction by conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.  J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4 (3) 276- 281PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Mognol  PChosidow  DMarmuse  JP Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed vertical banded gastroplasty.  Obes Surg 2007;17 (11) 1431- 1434PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Menon  TQuaddus  SCohen  L Revision of failed vertical banded gastroplasty to non-resectional Scopinaro biliopancreatic diversion: early experience.  Obes Surg 2006;16 (11) 1420- 1424PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Owens  BMOwens  MLHill  CW Effect of revisional bariatric surgery on weight loss and frequency of complications.  Obes Surg 1996;6 (6) 479- 484PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Buchwald  HAvidor  YBraunwald  E  et al.  Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  JAMA 2004;292 (14) 1724- 1737PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Sugerman  HJDeMaria  EJKellum  JMSugerman  ELMeador  JGWolfe  LG Effects of bariatric surgery in older patients.  Ann Surg 2004;240 (2) 243- 247PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Schouten  Rvan Dielen  FMvan Gemert  WGGreve  JW Conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass results in restoration of the positive effect on weight loss and co-morbidities: evaluation of 101 patients.  Obes Surg 2007;17 (5) 622- 630PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Gagner  MGentileschi  Pde Csepel  J  et al.  Laparoscopic reoperative bariatric surgery: experience from 27 consecutive patients.  Obes Surg 2002;12 (2) 254- 260PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Mognol  PChosidow  DMarmuse  JP Laparoscopic conversion of laparoscopic gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 70 patients.  Obes Surg 2004;14 (10) 1349- 1353PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Swain  P NOTES and anastomosis.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2008;18 (2) 261- 277, viiiPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Nguyen  NTRoot  JZainabadi  K  et al.  Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery.  Arch Surg 2005;140 (12) 1198- 1202PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Greve  JWRubino  F Bariatric surgery for metabolic disorders.  Br J Surg 2008;95 (11) 1313- 1314PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Jones  KB  Jr Revisional bariatric surgery—potentially safe and effective.  Surg Obes Relat Dis 2005;1 (6) 599- 603PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hollenbeak  CSRogers  ABarrus  BWadiwala  ICooney  R Surgical volume impacts bariatric surgery mortality: a case for centers of excellence.  Surgery 2008;144 (5) 736- 743PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Brolin  RECody  RP Impact of technological advances on complications of revisional bariatric operations.  J Am Coll Surg 2008;206 (3) 1137- 1144PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Article
February 2010

Revisional Bariatric Surgery: 13-Year Experience From a Tertiary Institution

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Nutrition Support and Morbid Obesity Unit (Ms Mead and Dr Kalfarentzos), Department of Surgery (Drs Spyropoulos, Kehagias, Panagiotopoulos, and Kalfarentzos), University Hospital of Patras, Rion, Greece.

Arch Surg. 2010;145(2):173-177. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.260

Objective  To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of revisional bariatric surgery at a tertiary institution. Revisional bariatric operations for unsuccessful weight loss or intolerable complications following the primary intervention are increasing.

Design  Case series from a prospective database.

Setting  Tertiary bariatric referral center.

Patients  From 1995 to 2008, 56 patients who had been formerly operated on for clinically severe obesity underwent a revisional procedure at our institution. Their mean (SD) age and body mass index were 39.6 (9.6) years and 46.9 (16.4), respectively. They were divided into 3 groups according to the indications for reoperation: (1) unsatisfactory weight loss (n = 39), (2) severe nutritional complications (n = 15), and (3) intolerable adverse effects (n = 2).

Main Outcome Measures  Effectiveness of the procedures according to the indication of revision and overall morbidity and mortality rates.

Results  Mean (SD) follow-up was 102 (8) months. There was no mortality but there was an early morbidity rate of 33.9% due to postoperative complications, including 2 cases of acute renal failure (3.6%), 5 anastomotic leaks (13.1%), 8 cases of pneumonia (14.3%), and 1 case each of wound infection, incisional dehiscence, bile leak, and small-bowel obstruction (1.8%). Late complications included stenosis of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in 2 patients (3.6%), hypoalbuminemia in 2 patients (3.6%), and incisional herniation in 9 patients (16.1%). Late morbidity was 23.2%.

Conclusion  Although revisional bariatric surgery is associated with higher risk of perioperative complications compared with the primary procedures, it appears to be safe and effective when performed in experienced centers.