Motivations to Pursue Fellowships Are Gender Neutral | Lifestyle Behaviors | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.186.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Borman  KRVick  LRBiester  TWMitchell  ME Changing demographics of residents choosing fellowships: longterm data from the American Board of Surgery.  J Am Coll Surg 2008;206 (5) 782- 789PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Sutherland  MJ A young surgeon's perspective on alternate surgical training pathways.  Am Surg 2007;73 (2) 114- 119PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Brundage  SILucci  AMiller  CCAzizzadeh  ASpain  DAKozar  RA Potential targets to encourage a surgical career.  J Am Coll Surg 2005;200 (6) 946- 953PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Cochran  AMelby  SNeumayer  LA An internet-based survey of factors influencing medical student selection of a general surgery career.  Am J Surg 2005;189 (6) 742- 746PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Gelfand  DVPodnos  YDWilson  SECooke  JWilliams  RA Choosing general surgery: insights into career choices of current medical students.  Arch Surg 2002;137 (8) 941- 947PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Wendel  TMGodellas  CVPrinz  RA Are there gender differences in choosing a surgical career?  Surgery 2003;134 (4) 591- 598PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Fischer  JE Enhancing the current broad-based training system and its necessity.  Am Surg 2007;73 (2) 130- 135PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Gabram  SGAllen  LWDeckers  PJ Surgical residents in the 1990s: issues and concerns for men and women.  Arch Surg 1995;130 (1) 24- 28PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Gabram  SGAHoenig  JSchroeder  JW  JrMansour  AGamelli  R What are the primary concerns of recently graduated surgeons and how do they differ from those of the residency training years?  Arch Surg 2001;136 (10) 1109- 1114Google ScholarCrossref
10.
McCord  JH McDonald  RLeverson  G  et al.  Motivation to pursue surgical subspecialty training: is there a gender difference?  J Am Coll Surg 2007;205 (5) 698- 703PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Stitzenberg  KBSheldon  GF Progressive specialization within general surgery: adding to the complexity of workforce planning.  J Am Coll Surg 2005;201 (6) 925- 932PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Bass  BL Early specialization in surgical training: an old concept whose time has come?  Semin Vasc Surg 2006;19 (4) 214- 217PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Etzioni  DALiu  JHMaggard  MAKo  CY The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce.  Ann Surg 2003;238 (2) 170- 177PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Vick  LRBorman  KR Instability of fellowship intentions during general surgery residencies.  J Surg Educ 2008;65 (6) 445- 452PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Borman  KRVick  LRDattilo  JBTarpley  JLMitchell  ME Factors in fellowship selection: effect of services and fellows [published online ahead of print June 18, 2008].  J Surg Res 2009;154 (2) 274- 278PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Yeo  HViola  KBerg  D  et al.  Attitudes, training experiences, and professional expectations of US general surgery residents.  JAMA 2009;302 (12) 1301- 1308PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Weinberger  SESmith  LGCollier  VUEducation Committee of the American College of Physicians, Redesigning training for internal medicine.  Ann Intern Med 2006;144 (12) 927- 932PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Diehl  AKKumar  VGateley  AAppleby  JLO’Keefe  ME Predictors of final specialty choice by internal medicine residents.  J Gen Intern Med 2006;21 (10) 1045- 1049PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Lambert  EMHolmboe  ES The relationship between specialty choice and gender of US medical students, 1990-2003.  Acad Med 2005;80 (9) 797- 802PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Paper
July 2010

Motivations to Pursue Fellowships Are Gender Neutral

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando (Dr Borman); American Board of Surgery, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Mr Biester and Dr Rhodes). Dr Borman is now with the Department of Surgery, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, Pennsylvania.

Arch Surg. 2010;145(7):671-678. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.116
Abstract

Objective  To determine the importance of factors in decision making by general surgery chief residents to pursue fellowships and to relate factor importance to gender and residency characteristics.

Design  Prospective, voluntary, national survey conducted April through May, 2008, in which finishing chief residents rated the importance of 12 factors in their decision making to pursue fellowships.

Setting  General surgery chief residents who applied for admission to the American Board of Surgery Qualifying Examination process.

Participants  All 1034 first-time applicants.

Main Outcome Measures  χ2 tests and 1-way analyses of variance were used to correlate gender and residency type, size, and location with summed values and scaled mean scores for ratings of the importance of 12 potential factors in fellowship decision making.

Results  The fellowship rate was 77% and correlated with residency size and location. Women were dispersed asymmetrically across residencies overall but future female fellows were distributed similarly to male ones. Survey item response rates for future fellows were 96% to 98%. Clinical mastery and specialty activities were valued most highly by more than 90% of men and women. Men placed more value on income potential and spousal influence. Lifestyle factors reached only midrange importance for both genders. Program size had more significant relationships to decision-making factors than did gender.

Conclusions  The ability to master an area of clinical practice and the clinical activities of a specialty are the most important factors for chief residents in fellowship decision making, regardless of gender. Lifestyle factors are of midrange importance. Program size is as influential as is gender.

×