Accelerating the Pace of Surgical Quality Improvement: The Power of Hospital Collaboration | Surgery | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Dimick  JBChen  SLTaheri  PAHenderson  WGKhuri  SFCampbell  DA  Jr Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.  J Am Coll Surg 2004;199 (4) 531- 537PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Dimick  JBWeeks  WBKaria  RJDas  SCampbell  DA  Jr Who pays for poor surgical quality? building a business case for quality improvement.  J Am Coll Surg 2006;202 (6) 933- 937PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Zilberberg  MDShorr  AFKollef  MH Implementing quality improvements in the intensive care unit: ventilator bundle as an example.  Crit Care Med 2009;37 (1) 305- 309PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Kollef  MHAfessa  BAnzueto  A  et al. NASCENT Investigation Group, Silver-coated endotracheal tubes and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia: the NASCENT randomized trial.  JAMA 2008;300 (7) 805- 813PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS, Medicare program; hospital outpatient prospective payment system and CY 2007 payment rates; CY 2007 update to the ambulatory surgical center covered procedures list; Medicare administrative contractors; and reporting hospital quality data for FY 2008 inpatient prospective payment system annual payment update program—HCAHPS survey, SCIP, and mortality. Final rule with comment period and final rule.  Fed Regist 2006;71 (226) 67959- 68401PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
O’Connor  GTPlume  SKOlmstead  EM  et al. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group, A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery.  JAMA 1996;275 (11) 841- 846PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Moscucci  MShare  DKline-Rogers  E  et al. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2), The Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) collaborative quality improvement initiative in percutaneous coronary interventions.  J Interv Cardiol 2002;15 (5) 381- 386PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Moscucci  MRogers  EKMontoye  C  et al.  Association of a continuous quality improvement initiative with practice and outcome variations of contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions.  Circulation 2006;113 (6) 814- 822PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Pronovost  PNeedham  DBerenholtz  S  et al.  An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU.  N Engl J Med 2006;355 (26) 2725- 2732PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Pronovost  P Interventions to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU: the Keystone Intensive Care Unit Project.  Am J Infect Control 2008;36 (10) S171e1- S171e5PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Englesbe  MJDimick  JBSonnenday  CJShare  DACampbell  DA  Jr The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative: will a statewide quality improvement initiative pay for itself?  Ann Surg 2007;246 (6) 1100- 1103PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Khuri  SFDaley  JHenderson  WG The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs.  Arch Surg 2002;137 (1) 20- 27PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Khuri  SFDaley  JHenderson  W  et al. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program, The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care.  Ann Surg 1998;228 (4) 491- 507PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Khuri  SFDaley  JHenderson  W  et al.  The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care.  J Am Coll Surg 1995;180 (5) 519- 531PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Khuri  SFHenderson  WGDaley  J  et al. Principal Investigators of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study, Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.  Ann Surg 2008;248 (2) 329- 336PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Khuri  SFDaley  JHenderson  W  et al.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study.  J Am Coll Surg 1997;185 (4) 315- 327PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Tarone  RE A modified Bonferroni method for discrete data.  Biometrics 1990;46 (2) 515- 522PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Wheeler  DJChambers  DS Understanding Statistical Process Control. 2nd ed. Knoxville, TN: SPC Press; 1992
19.
Rosenthal  MBDudley  RA Pay-for-performance: will the latest payment trend improve care?  JAMA 2007;297 (7) 740- 744PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Werner  RMGoldman  LEDudley  RA Comparison of change in quality of care between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals.  JAMA 2008;299 (18) 2180- 2187PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Rosenthal  MBLandon  BENormand  SLFrank  RGAhmad  TSEpstein  AM Employers' use of value-based purchasing strategies.  JAMA 2007;298 (19) 2281- 2288PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS, Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2008 rates.  Fed Regist 2007;72 (162) 47129- 48175PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Rosenthal  MB Beyond pay for performance—emerging models of provider-payment reform.  N Engl J Med 2008;359 (12) 1197- 1200PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Article
October 2010October 18, 2010

Accelerating the Pace of Surgical Quality Improvement: The Power of Hospital Collaboration

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery (Drs Campbell and Englesbe, Mr Kubus, and Ms Phillips) and Family Medicine (Dr Share), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and Departments of Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak (Dr Shanley), Henry Ford Health System, Detroit (Dr Velanovich), St John Hospital and Medical Center, Grosse Pointe (Dr Lloyd), Allegiance Health, Jackson (Dr Hutton), and St Joseph Mercy Health System, Ypsilanti (Dr Arneson), Michigan.

Arch Surg. 2010;145(10):985-991. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.220
Abstract

Hypothesis  A regional collaborative approach is an efficient platform for surgical quality improvement.

Design  Retrospective cohort study.

Setting  Academic research.

Patients  Patients undergoing general and vascular surgical procedures in 16 hospitals of the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) were evaluated quarterly to discuss surgical quality, to identify best practices, and to assess problems with process implementation.

Main Outcome Measures  Results among MSQC patients were compared with those among 126 non-Michigan hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) over the same interval.

Results  A total of 315 699 patients were included in the analysis. To assess improvement, patients were stratified into 2 periods (T1 and T2). The 35 422 MSQC patients (10.7% morbidity in T1 vs 9.7% in T2 [9.0% reduction], P = .002) showed improvement, while 280 277 non-Michigan ACS NSQIP patients did not (12.4% morbidity in T1 and T2, P = .49). No improvements in mortality rates were noted in either group. Overall, the odds of experiencing a complication in T2 compared with T1 were significantly less in the MSQC group (odds ratio, 0.898) than in the non-Michigan ACS NSQIP group (odds ratio, 1.000) (P=.004).

Conclusion  A statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative supported by a third-party payer showed significant improvement in quality and high levels of participant satisfaction.

×