Answer: Jejunal Diverticular Perforation Secondary to Delayed Distal Migrationof Biliary Endoprosthesis
The computed tomogram revealed evidence of pneumoperitoneum and distal migration of the straight biliary stent, which had protruded through a small-bowel loop (Figure 2). The presence of stent migration on the scout radiograph is suggested by the abnormal orientation of its distal end, which does not take the course of a native duodenum, as well as the unusually low position of its proximal end in relation to the visualized gas in the biliary tree.
The patient underwent an urgent laparotomy and retrieval of the stent, which had perforated a jejunal diverticulum. There was no sign of the pigtail stent. The involved segment of jejunum was resected, and the patient made an uneventful recovery. He underwent a further ERCP, with placement of a metal biliary stent followed by endovascular repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Migration of biliary endoprostheses can be early (developing during endoscopic insertion) or delayed (manifesting days to several months thereafter). Migration may be further classified as proximal (into the biliary system) or distal (into the duodenum or elsewhere in the bowel). Although delayed stent migration is not uncommon, distal impaction and secondary bowel perforation are rare, particularly beyond the ligament of Treitz.1 Risk factors for bowel perforation include the use of straight or plastic stents, placement of a stent to manage benign biliary disease (particularly papillary stenosis), omission of sphincterotomy, and presence of abdominal wall hernias, bowel adhesions, or colonic diverticula.2-4 To our knowledge, this is the first description of jejunal diverticular perforation secondary to migration of a plastic biliary stent. Whether the presence of a large abdominal aortic aneurysm also contributed in this case to recurrent stent dislocation and/or impaction is unclear. In cases of intraperitoneal perforation of the bowel, a laparotomy is usually required, although endoscopic, percutaneous, and laparoscopic approaches have been described.1 To reduce the risk of distal stent migration, the use of stents with multiple intraductal flanges has been advocated.5
The development of unexplained abdominal pain in any patient with a history of biliary endoprosthesis, however distant, should always prompt consideration of this rare, but potentially lethal, complication.
Return to Quiz Case.
Correspondence: Muhammad F. Dawwas, MRCP, Cambridge Hepatobiliary Service, Box 210, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom (drdawwas@gmail.com).
Accepted for Publication: December 7, 2009.
Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Dawwas and Jah. Acquisition of data: Dawwas, Griffiths, Winterbottom, Huguet, and Gimson. Analysis and interpretation of data: Dawwas, Griffiths, Winterbottom, Huguet, and Gimson. Drafting of the manuscript: Dawwas, Jah, and Huguet. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Dawwas, Jah, Griffiths, Winterbottom, Huguet, and Gimson. Administrative, technical, and material support: Dawwas, Jah, and Huguet. Study supervision: Jah, Huguet, and Gimson.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
1.Birkett
DHBirkett
DHBirkett
DHBirkett
DH Percutaneous retrieval of a biliary stent after migration and ileal perforation.
World J Emerg Surg200946
PubMed
doi:10.1186/1749-7922-4-6
Google Scholar 2.Birkett
DHBirkett
DHBirkett
DH Incidence and risk factors for biliary and pancreatic stent migration.
Gastrointest Endosc 1992;38
(3)
341- 346
PubMedGoogle Scholar 3.Birkett
DHBirkett
DHBirkett
DH
et al. The effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy on acute and chronic complications of biliary endoprostheses.
Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49
(6)
716- 719
PubMedGoogle Scholar 4.Birkett
DHBirkett
DHBirkett
DH
et al. Complications and treatment of migrated biliary endoprostheses: a review of the literature.
World J Gastroenterol 2007;13
(40)
5397- 5399
PubMedGoogle Scholar 5.Birkett
DHBirkett
DHBirkett
DHBirkett
DH Pancreatitis and duodenal perforation as complications of an endoscopically placed biliary stent.
Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40
(3)
365- 366
PubMedGoogle Scholar