Critical Role of Identification of the Second Gland During Unilateral Parathyroid Surgery: A Prospective Review of 119 Patients With Concordant Localization | Endocrine Surgery | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.239.150.57. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Kebebew  EClark  OH Parathyroid adenoma, hyperplasia, and carcinoma: localization, technical details of primary neck exploration, and treatment of hypercalcemic crisis.  Surg Oncol Clin N Am 1998;7 (4) 721- 748PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Sackett  WRBarraclough  BReeve  TSDelbridge  LW Worldwide trends in the surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism in the era of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy.  Arch Surg 2002;137 (9) 1055- 1059PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Norman  JChheda  HFarrell  C Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: decreasing operative time and potential complications while improving cosmetic results.  Am Surg 1998;64 (5) 391- 396PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Gawande  AAMonchik  JMAbbruzzese  TAIannuccilli  JDIbrahim  SIMoore  FD  Jr Reassessment of parathyroid hormone monitoring during parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism after 2 preoperative localization studies.  Arch Surg 2006;141 (4) 381- 384PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Smith  NMagnuson  JSVidrine  DMKulbersh  BPeters  GE Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: use of intraoperative parathyroid hormone assays after 2 preoperative localization studies.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135 (11) 1108- 1111PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Kebebew  EHwang  JReiff  EDuh  QYClark  OH Predictors of single-gland vs multigland parathyroid disease in primary hyperparathyroidism: a simple and accurate scoring model.  Arch Surg 2006;141 (8) 777- 782PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Stalberg  PSidhu  SSywak  MRobinson  BWilkinson  MDelbridge  L Intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement during minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: does it “value-add” to decision-making?  J Am Coll Surg 2006;203 (1) 1- 6PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Arici  CCheah  WKItuarte  PHG  et al.  Can localization studies be used to direct focused parathyroid operations?  Surgery 2001;129 (6) 720- 729PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Chen  HPruhs  ZStarling  JRMack  E Intraoperative parathyroid hormone testing improves cure rates in patients undergoing minimally invasive parathyroidectomy.  Surgery 2005;138 (4) 583- 590PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Mihai  RPalazzo  FFGleeson  FVSadler  GP Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy without intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.  Br J Surg 2007;94 (1) 42- 47PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Pang  TStalberg  PSidhu  S  et al.  Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy using the lateral focused mini-incision technique without intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring.  Br J Surg 2007;94 (3) 315- 319PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Udelsman  R Six hundred fifty-six consecutive explorations for primary hyperparathyroidism.  Ann Surg 2002;235 (5) 665- 672PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Irvin  GL  IIICarneiro  DMSolorzano  CC Progress in the operative management of sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism over 34 years.  Ann Surg 2004;239 (5) 704- 711PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Grant  CSThompson  GFarley  Dvan Heerden  J Primary hyperparathyroidism surgical management since the introduction of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: Mayo Clinic experience.  Arch Surg 2005;140 (5) 472- 479PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Agarwal  GBarakate  MSRobinson  B  et al.  Intraoperative quick parathyroid hormone versus same-day parathyroid hormone testing for minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: a cost-effectiveness study.  Surgery 2001;130 (6) 963- 970PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Gauger  PGAgarwal  GEngland  BG  et al.  Intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring fails to detect double parathyroid adenomas: a 2-institution experience.  Surgery 2001;130 (6) 1005- 1010PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Duh  QY What's new in general surgery: endocrine surgery.  J Am Coll Surg 2005;201 (5) 746- 753PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Morris  LFZanocco  KItuarte  PHG  et al.  The value of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring in localized primary hyperparathyroidism: a cost analysis.  Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17 (3) 679- 685PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Siperstein  ABerber  EBarbosa  GF  et al.  Predicting the success of limited exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism using ultrasound, sestamibi, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone: analysis of 1158 cases.  Ann Surg 2008;248 (3) 420- 428PubMedGoogle Scholar
Paper
May 2011May 16, 2011

Critical Role of Identification of the Second Gland During Unilateral Parathyroid Surgery: A Prospective Review of 119 Patients With Concordant Localization

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):512-516. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.91
Abstract

Hypothesis  We aimed to validate the effectiveness of a protocol for primary hyperparathyroidism in which intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement (IOPTH) was not routinely used during minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for patients with dual localization by technetium Tc 99m sestamibi (MIBI) and ultrasonography and hypothesized that our rate of surgical failure would be less than 3% for patients with concordant localization.

Design  Prospective cohort study.

Setting  Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Patients  One hundred nineteen patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and dual localization.

Main Outcome Measures  Incidence of surgical cure following minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) without the use of IOPTH for patients with dual localization.

Results  A total of 324 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism underwent parathyroid exploration between October 1, 2005, and September 30, 2009. In 136 patients (42.0%), imaging was concordant by MIBI and ultrasonography, and 119 patients were scheduled for MIP. Our protocol for MIP without IOPTH was successful in 115 patients (97%), with 13 cases converted to bilateral exploration based on intraoperative suspicion of multiglandular disease. Eight of 13 conversions (62%) revealed multiglandular disease that was undetected on imaging, 6 of which were apparent from examination of the ipsilateral second parathyroid gland. Four of 136 patients (3%) had persistent postoperative hypercalcemia necessitating reoperation, and all 4 had an adjacent but unseen second adenoma. There was no significant difference in the surgical cure rate following MIP without IOPTH for this prospective study vs a previously published retrospective analysis by our group (97% vs 98%, P = .47).

Conclusions  Focused parathyroid gland exploration without IOPTH can be successfully performed in a select group of patients with dual localization by MIBI and ultrasonography. However, identification of the second ipsilateral gland may be critical to ruling out undetected multiglandular disease.

×