[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.172.233.215. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Original Article
July 1, 2007

Evaluation of White Blood Cell Count, Neutrophil Percentage, and Elevated Temperature as Predictors of Bloodstream Infection in Burn Patients

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (Drs Murray, Hoffmaster, Hospenthal, Cancio, and Wolf); University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio (Mr Schmit and Dr Wolf); and US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston (Drs Cancio and Wolf).

Arch Surg. 2007;142(7):639-642. doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.7.639
Abstract

Objective  To investigate whether specific values of or changes in temperature, white blood cell count, or neutrophil percentage were predictive of bloodstream infection in burn patients.

Design  Retrospective review of electronic records.

Setting  Intensive care center at the US Army Institute of Surgical Research Burn Center.

Patients  Burn patients with blood cultures obtained from 2001 to 2004.

Main Outcome Measures  Temperature recorded at the time blood cultures were obtained; highest temperature in each 6-hour interval during the 24 hours prior to this; white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage at the time of obtaining the blood culture and during the 24 hours preceding the blood culture; demographic data; and total body surface area burned.

Results  A total of 1063 blood cultures were obtained from 223 patients. Seventy-three people had 140 blood cultures from which microorganisms were recovered. Organisms that were recovered from blood cultures included 80 that were gram negative, 54 that were gram positive, 3 that were mixed gram positive/gram negative, and 3 yeasts. Although white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage at the time of the culture were statistically different between patients with and patients without bloodstream infection, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed these values to be poor discriminators (receiver operating characteristic curve area = 0.624). Temperature or alterations in temperature in the preceding 24-hour period did not predict presence, absence, or type of bloodstream infection.

Conclusions  Temperature, white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, or changes in these values were not clinically reliable in predicting bloodstream infection. Further work is needed to identify alternative clinical parameters, which should prompt blood culture evaluations in this population.

×